| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vrbvqf$33lt$1@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Evolutionary creationism
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:26:24 -0500
Organization: University of Ediacara
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vrbvqf$33lt$1@solani.org>
References: <80n5tjlmnh8ltdbqvq9u70v42if0b2p3m1@4ax.com>
<vqus1t$3b318$1@dont-email.me> <0rp7tjpot0kabd8injclb45gcckr5qq98e@4ax.com>
<vr19g6$1a82h$2@dont-email.me> <h0o8tj506ocrtv8grersenst3arqfjdrtl@4ax.com>
<vr201d$1t8b9$1@dont-email.me> <gec9tjt0mn3ejqn14931ie8af5fib1bkbp@4ax.com>
<vr3q89$3eivs$1@dont-email.me> <b91btj9e7dke1cdr5qmqggrjvrg8h0gnnd@4ax.com>
<vr6kgo$1re2c$1@dont-email.me> <oe8gtjtuk69k8neuv64j85hc07bhn4ua6v@4ax.com>
<vra4bi$26h5$1@solani.org> <h4aitjteusr4q2od63urdli1o36ch8a967@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
logging-data="27941"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B6GyI1YHSZppD7qD62wEFXXXeRY=
Return-Path: <news@reader5.news.weretis.net>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
id 93BC622978C; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7CA229783
for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
id 2BFFE1C0A98; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:26:27 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2608F1C0655
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:26:27 +0000 (UTC)
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by pmx.weretis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7B43E971
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:26:24 +0100 (CET)
id 5064B3E8F9; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:26:24 +0100 (CET)
X-User-ID: eJwFwQEBACAIA7BMCj8QR/T0j+AG4+INJ+gYTEfrZm5QVdWmyVC2XjF9OQIHT+vYkTYTHygFEVs=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <h4aitjteusr4q2od63urdli1o36ch8a967@4ax.com>
Bytes: 4419
Lines: 48
On 2025-03-18 3:13 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:31:30 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-03-17 8:31 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:42:49 -0500, RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> [giant snip]
>
> Thank you for that. I had to stop snipping replies to Ron because if
> you snip anything at all, he claims you were running from his
> arguments and reposts the same stuff so you end up with a post 2 or 3
> times longer than it needs to be :(
>
>>>>
>>>> QUOTE:
>>>> We believe that God acts purposefully in creation, just as he does in
>>>> our lives, and that he continues to actively uphold and sustain creation.
>>>> END QUOTE:
>>>
>>> And again, nothing there about God tweaking life the way Behe claims.
>>> [another giant snip]
>>
>> Out of curiosity, what do you think the phrase "he continues to actively
>> uphold and sustain creation." mean? I mean, in particular "continues"
>> and "actively".
>
> I see this as a background thing, not a direct process. I have 5
> grown-up children, all with children of their own. I continue to
> actively uphold and sustain them in whatever way they need but I do
> not *interfere* in their lives. If, for example, they make decisions
> that I don't agree with, I *might* offer an opinion if I think it will
> be welcome but the decision is entirely theirs and I fully accept and
> support whatever they do decide. The help and support I (and my wife)
> give them is on request, not pushed on them, though they know it is
> available when needed, and is given unconditionally.
>
> That's why I think the analogy of God as father is a particularly apt
> one.
>
>
I'm having difficulty reconciling that view with a purported omniscient
entity.
--
--
Don Cates ("he's a cunning rascal" PN)