| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vrcngn$3a9aj$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Interesting. ChatGPT fails defending starlight deflection when photons graze Sun's surface Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 23:36:40 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <cb99a67524f1afc5df09423cdc24c240@www.novabbs.com> References: <9f729554aafb0be632aaeebd57833d95@www.novabbs.com> <50e95221946b7dc5e8e31d1c19dae7c2@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="206965"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$XjtqU46qNJbYWd8/kwDSaOcVAs9Yv31l7G8nXCQb2Pv7zsKBcx4JS X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939 Bytes: 2314 Lines: 23 On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:20:48 +0000, patdolan wrote: > Wonderful scholarship, as always Richard. And a very entertaining read. > The Einstein Field Equations are comically complicated and utterly > unusable. Their closed form is printed on T-shirts, painted on the > sides of academic buildings, printed atop textbook chapter headings, > memorized and scrawled on classroom blackboards like a magical > incantation or a Buddhist koan. But they are absolutely powerless to > even compute the normal force that a bowl of soup exerts on my dinning > room tabletop. > > Does Einstein try anywhere to explain the illicit double use of curved > spacetime in his explanation of the 1.75" bending of starlight at the > lim? To wit, he attributes 87.5" to Newtonian gravity (whose cause we > are taught is spacetime curvature and already baked in to Newtonian > gravity) and then he goes and attributes another 87.5" to spacetime > curvature. So he is actually resorting to spacetime curvature twice. > Even a high schooler would have had the common sense to unify the > curvature of starlight into one agency, instead of two--one of which is > derivative of the other. Silly. Hi Pat! Glad to see that you found this site. You were missed!