Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrcngn$3a9aj$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Interesting. ChatGPT fails defending starlight deflection when photons
 graze Sun's surface
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 23:36:40 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <cb99a67524f1afc5df09423cdc24c240@www.novabbs.com>
References: <9f729554aafb0be632aaeebd57833d95@www.novabbs.com> <50e95221946b7dc5e8e31d1c19dae7c2@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="206965"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$XjtqU46qNJbYWd8/kwDSaOcVAs9Yv31l7G8nXCQb2Pv7zsKBcx4JS
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
Bytes: 2314
Lines: 23

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:20:48 +0000, patdolan wrote:

> Wonderful scholarship, as always Richard.  And a very entertaining read.
>  The Einstein Field Equations are comically complicated and utterly
> unusable.  Their closed form is printed on T-shirts, painted on the
> sides of academic buildings, printed atop textbook chapter headings,
> memorized and scrawled on classroom blackboards like a magical
> incantation or a Buddhist koan.  But they are absolutely powerless to
> even compute the normal force that a bowl of soup exerts on my dinning
> room tabletop.
>
> Does Einstein try anywhere to explain the illicit double use of curved
> spacetime in his explanation of the 1.75" bending of starlight at the
> lim?  To wit, he attributes 87.5" to Newtonian gravity (whose cause we
> are taught is spacetime curvature and already baked in to Newtonian
> gravity) and then he goes and attributes another 87.5" to  spacetime
> curvature.  So he is actually resorting to spacetime curvature twice.
> Even a high schooler would have had the common sense to unify the
> curvature of starlight into one agency, instead of two--one of which is
> derivative of the other.  Silly.

Hi Pat!

Glad to see that you found this site. You were missed!