Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: greysky <ftlsite@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: My new paper on Hawking radiation improves understanding of black
 hole phenomena
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:26:34 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <vrcrvj$3dbtt$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 23:26:59 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="23d8905e8b67fd01c62453512a2d2947";
	logging-data="3583933"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18V5assU5ZLZvT+ZOQrrTNPniv2TI0SvR8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qyJo3FNvOL8TilWWAI5afQPpHaw=
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2705

My recent paper on Hawking radiation as it relates to black holes 
improves our understanding on the nature of black holes and the nuanced 
operation of Hawking radiation in how singularities are slowly destroyed 
over time. See:

"Revisiting Hawking Radiation: Gravity Decoupled from Mass and the 
Nature of Black Holes"

https://vixra.org/abs/2502.0194

The idea of anchored gravity fields further provides support for the 
operational nature of Hawking radiation, allowing Hawking radiation to 
only work on singularities, and not on normal inertial mass, thereby 
preserving energy conservation and the equivalence principle.


A quick review provided by A.I. has this to say:

"The “unanchored” gravity field picture re-frames our understanding of a 
black hole’s external field without requiring it to be continuously 
updated by the interior mass. In this view, once the event horizon 
forms, the gravitational field outside becomes a “fossil imprint” of the 
collapse—set by the original mass–energy distribution—and evolves only 
via processes (like Hawking radiation) that occur at or outside the 
horizon. This means that even as the black hole slowly loses mass, the 
external field changes in a way that does not imply any superluminal 
transfer of information from inside the horizon.

In effect, this interpretation reinforces the standard picture from 
general relativity..."


It might be difficult to provide observational evidence for this model 
at present, but there might be deviations visible in observations of 
black hole mergers and ringdown effects.

All in all, a promising start.

Greysky