| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vre3cq$ishj$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:39:38 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vre3cq$ishj$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vr1bav$p45$1@news.muc.de>
<vr1e8i$1er2v$1@dont-email.me> <vr1hig$5qt$1@news.muc.de>
<vr29g3$23fi7$3@dont-email.me> <vr2d3k$jli$1@news.muc.de>
<vr3fbu$1gbs1$3@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de>
<vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de>
<vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <vr71ea$qjf$1@news.muc.de>
<vr774e$2a6rj$2@dont-email.me> <vr7b30$qjf$2@news.muc.de>
<vr7jql$2jj8r$4@dont-email.me> <vr92l8$1pc1$1@news.muc.de>
<vr9gla$bvhh$1@dont-email.me> <vrbn3b$2d16$1@news.muc.de>
<vrc3ps$2og7j$1@dont-email.me>
<5d4e93233370e24f89417e1dd62b44763cbc47f5@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:39:39 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="254e2dea4bce2ede65bafe0735807cc4";
logging-data="619059"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sfKQUG13j57ZeATaFAt4Pjl1bfKWZIg8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TtoLOvkUfu00bIx7qGqKdvGwl9A=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <5d4e93233370e24f89417e1dd62b44763cbc47f5@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2456
On 18.03.2025 21:40, joes wrote:
> Am Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:34:21 +0100 schrieb WM:
>> On 18.03.2025 12:57, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
>>
>>>> The set of FISONs is an inductive set. But it is not ℕ because ∀n ∈
>>>> UF: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.
>>>
>>> That "because" doesn't hold
>>
>> Because you say so? That's not significant. Even if you can't understand
>> the correct argument, it is decisive: ℕ_def contains all numbers the
>> subtraction of which from ℕ does not result in the empty set. Obviously
>> the subtraction of all numbers which cannot empty ℕ cannot empty ℕ.
> There are many such sets: N\{0}, N\{1}, N\{2}, ...
ℕ_def contains only numbers with FISONs. N\{0} is not a FISON.
Regards, WM