Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The existence of dark numbers proved by the thinned out harmonic,
 series
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:48:31 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vreauf$pg2m$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <vr71ea$qjf$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr774e$2a6rj$2@dont-email.me> <vr7ma8$2onbj$2@dont-email.me>
 <vr8arv$3dccd$1@dont-email.me> <vr9tha$pvuu$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr9url$q03i$2@dont-email.me> <vrbc8g$23ker$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrbek0$276rm$1@dont-email.me> <vrbfl1$27e67$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrbg13$28e26$1@dont-email.me> <vrbgkp$27e67$2@dont-email.me>
 <vrboaj$2d16$3@news.muc.de> <vrc25c$2ndfn$1@dont-email.me>
 <a3e7552e9a599c1b71b63ca0d3a781d873e1d188@i2pn2.org>
 <vrc43t$2og7j$2@dont-email.me>
 <78af842d77c9df6ef78300a6c765ddc0e8b543f5@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:48:33 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6f9f26c81ac23d253c44dec1578e707c";
	logging-data="835670"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7+Vu1e6x5qyWi+jWY+f0F9xfyLQsWFDo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/gAusqImohS/61BSGLv6ChqXuUs=
In-Reply-To: <78af842d77c9df6ef78300a6c765ddc0e8b543f5@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2481

On 18.03.2025 21:45, joes wrote:
> Am Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:39:42 +0100 schrieb WM:
>> On 18.03.2025 16:08, joes wrote:

>>>>> "Potential infinity" doesn't exist in modern mathematics.
>>>> Therefore modern mathematics is rubbish. By the way this degenerated
>>>> form of "mathematics" is the first kind which has turned out
>>>> completely useless for any application. Small wonder. It is wrong.
>>> Any examples?
>> Sorry, there is not the slightest example for an application of
>> transfinite set theory.
> (Modern) mathematics isn't all transfinite set theory.

But matheologians claim that it was.

> But I meant
> examples where applied mathematics is useless.

I said that transfinite set theory is useless.

Regards, WM