Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vrf8v9$1iffb$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR. Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:25:14 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <vrf8v9$1iffb$2@dont-email.me> References: <8d05bbe123c740f2934b31e367a92231@www.novabbs.com> <65006a73bc196736fbec3d54e21fa717@www.novabbs.com> <vr9tmf$q4vi$1@dont-email.me> <0c0b2bb49434e61879858abed2b9d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <vrbtgj$2k1q7$1@dont-email.me> <a1b3bbfca4b1e9797d98903a77f0cf59@www.novabbs.com> <f58a6ba75e73908078c5576f74ffe329@www.novabbs.com> <9ed9e92086e0d99fde7d81edfced643a@www.novabbs.com> <0082c223a6c8e6952b11ec32b83c473b@www.novabbs.com> <d38ac7fb8de3a1e3c8f08908a6e1953a@www.novabbs.com> <40f0e2c10ed1e2c2d24989b4c7917802@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:20:57 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="488d3fe1513126c63e88b4e4de013734"; logging-data="1654251"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Zo/YJVENMrJRKMHH6h2bV" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z1rtWVINxBmDvd/wR/rqpavUDwo= In-Reply-To: <40f0e2c10ed1e2c2d24989b4c7917802@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2516 Den 19.03.2025 01:58, skrev rhertz: > > - The calculation of the 38 usec/day REQUIRES A THEORETICAL SEPARATION > of GR > and SR effects using Schwarzschild. It's the same crap that in the > Hafele- > Keating 1972 experiment, where data for SR and GR were calculated > theoretically. > > - The ALLEGED EFFECT of the 7 us/day due to SR are MISCALCULATED using > Schwarzschild, because this alleged effect MANIFEST in rectilinear > trajectories, NOT IN NON-INERTIAL TRAJECTORIES OF AN ELLIPTIC ORBIT!!! Richard, you are babbling. SR isn't applicable in the curved spacetime near the Earth. It's all GR. See: https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf This is what GR predicts, and your opinion is worthless, because you are completely ignorant of spacetime physics. ------------------- BTW: "NON-INERTIAL TRAJECTORIES OF AN ELLIPTIC ORBIT!!!" ROFL -- Paul https://paulba.no/