Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrgree$190g9$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=22=27Scammers_stole_=C2=A340k_after_EDF_gave_out_m?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?y_number=22?=
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:42:21 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <vrgree$190g9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq478a$1a6p9$1@dont-email.me> <m2sdlgF2fjiU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vqc9e4$30gdm$1@dont-email.me> <m2u1avF9uqaU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vqcug0$345ts$1@dont-email.me> <vqes1l$3i7oj$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqf0ca$3j5oo$1@dont-email.me> <buh*n6r9z@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
 <vr3pav$3eto7$1@dont-email.me> <vr3s4m$3hdbg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr4ere$eqk$1@dont-email.me> <vr5git$t0ll$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr6kqh$1t946$1@dont-email.me> <cuh*FQB9z@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
 <vr6src$23f7c$1@dont-email.me> <duh*2rC9z@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
 <vr8nul$3mi0m$1@dont-email.me> <vr99gp$8osv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr9d22$3mi0m$3@dont-email.me> <vr9qiq$nfdi$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:42:25 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69e66de31527215d7963caeeb7267a26";
	logging-data="1344009"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/9DZdh0TXyEzYmlIEuQXs"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F1cM0f4LrsgcpH4gqohSquozgGM=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vr9qiq$nfdi$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5265

On 17/03/2025 18:44, Java Jive wrote:
> On 2025-03-17 14:53, Nick Finnigan wrote:
>> On 17/03/2025 13:53, Java Jive wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-17 08:53, Nick Finnigan wrote:
>>>> On 16/03/2025 18:00, Theo wrote:
>>>>> In uk.telecom.mobile Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, how would he have known the answers to the security questions to
>>>>>> enable the SIM swap, and his emails were from Virgin Media, while the
>>>>>> SIM was from O2.  Although not initially, my reading of the original
>>>>>> article is now unambiguously that the email hack preceded the SIM swap
>>>>>> and provided the initial personal information necessary to accomplish
>>>>>> everything that followed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Virgin Media O2 are one company - VM and O2 merged June 2021.  I don't 
>>>>> know
>>>>> whether they have merged customer accounts such that the same security
>>>>> details are used for both.  In which case it may be that one set of 
>>>>> details
>>>>> gives access to both mobile and emails.
>>>>
>>>> "If you've linked your Virgin Media and O2 details to create a new 
>>>> Virgin Media O2 ID, sign in with it here."
>>>>
>>>> https://accounts.o2.co.uk/signin
>>>
>>> But Theo's own transcription of events from the BBC Radio documentary 
>>> makes clear that he had not done so (first and last entries from this 
>>> excerpt):
>>
>>   That does not make it clear to me (he would still have an O2 password 
>> as well as a VM/O2 password).
> 
> I disagree, your own quote shows that if it was a joint account for both, 
> he'd only have needed the one password, whereas the Theo's transcription 
> makes it plain that there were two.

  He would still have an O2 password, as well as a VM/02 password.
  (See the O2 website)

>>> In brief:
>>> - received a text from O2 (mobile operator) saying he'd changed his 
>>> password
>>> - contacted O2 straight away and told SIM had been swapped
>>> - told they'd stop that and send out a new SIM card, emailed to confirm
>>> - next morning, email from EDF (energy supplier) asking for feedback on 
>>> recent contact with customer services
>>> - called EDF, told they'd pass it on to the fraud section and get back 
>>> to him
>>> - nothing happened for over a week
>>> - called O2 again to make sure everything was stopped, put through to 
>>> fraud department
>>> - just after received an email saying new SIM card had been sent out,
>>> connected to a different number.  Queried with fraud department, said 
>>> didn't know, need to go to an O2 shop
>>> - O2 shop couldn't do much as account had been stopped, couldn't look at it
>>> - told them to check his emails
>>> - contacted Virgin Media (ISP, merged with O2), told he'd changed his 
>>> password, had to go through changing password back again, told they'd 
>>> pass it to the fraud section
>>>
>>> It's difficult to deduce from this the exact ordering of events ...
>>>
>>> Because he had to contact VM to find out that he'd changed his email 
>>
>>   'his password' may be 'his account password' rather than 'his email app 
>> password'.
> 
> If it is 'his account password', then that completely supports my argument, 
> not yours, and 'his email app password' doesn't make any sense, perhaps you 
> mean 'his email password', but, unless he has multiple email addresses 
> under a single account with VM, of which there is no mention, why would he 
> need a separate email password?

  VM use the term 'email app password' (see their website).