Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrh548$3a4q5$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:27:36 +0000
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vrh548$3a4q5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me>
 <87a59hvgyk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vrdi0g$47cb$3@dont-email.me>
 <vrdifm$4n2o$1@dont-email.me> <vrdj4b$47cb$4@dont-email.me>
 <vrdkcb$4n2o$2@dont-email.me> <86ecyronqa.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:27:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6f460b36cc498e8c1c99eefb8f44e3e6";
	logging-data="3478341"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lhHMnrmIzPm+8n2JzPIuie5LpGXlpW5OPh8g++Akj+Q=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dilTYgVRsnpa7J1nbnjeXur8AoY=
In-Reply-To: <86ecyronqa.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2345

On 20/03/2025 13:06, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
> 

<snip>

>>
>> I'm not sure a new edition is necessary, but if it is to be
>> written it would be better served by someone like Keith or Tim,
>> both of whom have (as I have not) kept up with the million-and-one
>> changes that appear to have assailed the simple language I once
>> enjoyed.
> 
> The C99 standard has a list of 54 what it calls "major changes",
> although IMO many or most of those are fairly minor.  There are also
> other differences relative to C90, but most of them are simply
> clarifications or slight changes in wording.

Those I largely recall from discussions at the time, but I dare 
to conclude that your lack of a reference to C11, C17, and C23 
means that they had a lesser effect on the language than I'd feared.

I see now from casual research that C17 was predominantly a bug 
fix, but that C11 and C23 were somewhat busier.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within