Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ghost-raider <ghost-raider@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: fr.rec.photo
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Un_nouveau_compact_int=C3=A9ressant?=
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:34:40 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <vrhqkg$300hm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vrh1m7$30903$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:34:41 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="66c52284379487a79801b11088a97147";
	logging-data="3146294"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sYCMe5KDw1399aADPix0xEDgHpLfB/8w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vCZXLvHdYMtUbTB771NjZAlLyGA=
Content-Language: fr
In-Reply-To: <vrh1m7$30903$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3530

Le 20/03/2025 à 13:28, efji a écrit :
> https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-gfx100rf-medium-format-fixed-lens-initial-review
> 
> Apparemment, après un grand trou, les fabricants ont presque tous (Fuji,
> Sony, Canon, Casio, peut-être d'autres) des compacts haut de gamme en
> préparation. Le succès du Fufi X100VI leur donne des idées. C'est une
> bonne nouvelle. Marre de tous ces FF monstrueux.
> 

C'est le type même de l'appareil d'appel, très cher (5500 € !), mal 
utilisable sans pied car sans aucune stabilisation, à optique fixe peu 
lumineuse, 9 formats (!) mais avec un capteur de 102 MP qui tiendra lieu 
de zoom et ramènera la bête à un vulgaire µ4/3 de 20 MP avec un 63 mm 
qui ne lui servira pas à grand-chose.
Des photographes vont saliver devant cette merveille inutile pour 
finalement acheter un autre Fuji, moins cher et plus universel, ce qui 
est le but de la manœuvre marketing.

Ca semble être aussi l'opinion du rédacteur :
"Realistically, though, none of that is really what this camera is 
about. It's about being an object that proves to yourself and others 
that you are a 'Photographer'.

Les commentaires aussi se demandent ce qu'on va bien pouvoir 
photographier avec cette chose hors de prix.

Exemple :
PhotoRotterdam
I wonder who this is for. The camera is a pretty provocative statement: 
both pretty and provocative. A 100MP without IBIS and 28mm equivalent 
focal length. Not unobtrusive enough for a street camera, not long 
enough for portraits.
I love they just do this, just like Sigma has released the BF, but I 
don’t see how it will fly besides the more sensible options, including 
other Fujifilm G line cameras.

mferencz:
This is a very specialized tool that is now limited by design, making it 
pretty impractical. It might sell, but nobody will need it necessarily 
over an interchangeable lens version.

I'd want the option to go wider and longer if I am paying 5k. Not to 
mention I wouldn't want it hanging around my neck as in a rangefinder 
body. It is a dud. A real cool one but a dud and doesn't make a lot of 
sense.

MrHollywood
I get the Q3, but not this setup. The lens is a 100% dealbreaker. Slow 
glass, poor bokeh, bulky design, mediocre substandard AF mated to a 
great sensor? HARD PASS. What was Fuji thinking? Oh, but it has a mic 
jack? Oh boy! Sorry, but this camera is a minor disaster.

Etc.. etc..