Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrhs2c$3ut85$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.xcski.com!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: GISAID sequence phylogeny for the H5 gene
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:59:06 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vrhs2c$3ut85$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="11955"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uZPdRM2hPaWNsyLDcLDdjRAlhT0=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id BB20222978C; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:59:22 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931DF229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:59:20 -0400 (EDT)
	id 144561C0ABF; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:59:13 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1FE1C0A94
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:59:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69AA5622B0
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:59:09 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/69AA5622B0; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
	id 2DB2ADC01CA; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:59:09 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:59:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19ejCoilsIeUUtvvmLW2ftD0aZ/aNoERTU=
Content-Language: en-US
	DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,
	FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
	URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org

https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-HA-tree/H5N1_HA_subsampled_tree_US_20250302.pdf

This is a phylogeny of the HA gene segment.  It is for the H5 Asian 
allele that is found in both the B3.13 dairy genotype and the D1.1 wild 
bird genotype that has started to be found in dairy cattle.

The B3.13 H5 sequence is at the top of the phylogeny and the D1.1 H5 
sequence is below and includes the Washington poultry worker 
(A/Washington/240/2024|2024-10-18).  A/Nevada/10/2025|2025-02-04 is a 
recent D1.1 dairy infection.  The H5 sequence came into the US in 2022, 
but the D1.1 and B3.13 alleles of the H5 gene may have separated before 
getting to the US.  They don't have any sequences from 2022 so I can't tell.

The bogus way that the USDA labels their sequences inhibits 
interpretation of the phylogeny.  The USDA only gives the collection 
date and sequencing date, and lists the location as USA.  GISAID seems 
to try to infer the location by the date of sequencing and press 
releases about those dates.  If they can't infer the location they leave 
it as USA which is useless for epidemiology within the US.

It looks like the Iowa and Wisconsin patients were infected with a D1.3 
genotype closely related to D1.1.  The Washington, Oregon, Wyoming, and 
Louisiana patients seem to have been infected with different strains of 
D1.1.  But all the D1.1 and D1.3 H5 alleles seem to come from a clade 
that may have branched off in 2022-2023.

Something is strange about the B3.13 genotype H5 alleles.  It has been 
known that the first human patient in Texas with the B3.13 genotype was 
a sequence outlier compared to all the other dairy sequences. 
A/Texas/37/2024|2024-03-28 still falls outside of all the other dairy 
sequences, but it now groups with a mountain lion from Montana, and a 
wild bird from Wyoming.  For the NA gene sequence the Texas patient is 
within the dairy clade instead of out side of it and is most closely 
related to the Missouri and Michigan human patients.  The Texas H5 
sequence may just have multiple mutations that occurred during the 
infection of that individual.  The mountain lion and wild bird N1 
sequences continue to fall outside of the dairy clade.  My take is that 
this means that the Texas patient H5 sequence should not be trusted in 
trying to figure out the source of the dairy infection.

One thing to note is that all the California H5 sequence dairy 
infections are a separate clade that looks significantly different from 
other dairy infections.  Their sequences are also more variable than 
those more closely related to the Texas B3.13 H5 sequences.  It looks 
like the infection has been in California for a lot longer than when it 
was first detected late last year.  For some reason there seems to have 
been sequence evolution before California was infected or after the 
first few herds were infected, possibly, before Texas was detected in 
March 2024.  They need to redo their estimated time of divergence for 
the dairy B3.13 genotype.  A full genome sequence comparison is likely 
needed to figure out how California fits in with the spread of the dairy 
virus.  California commercial poultry farms started to go down in the 
central valley in October/November 2023 when it was estimated that the 
dairy virus entered into dairy cattle.  Because of the stupid way that 
the USDA labels their sequences I could not tell which ones came from 
California last year, and I was told that the USDA did not give out the 
names of the researchers involved in the sequencing so that I could ask 
them to identify the California samples from 2023.

The PB2 data may have some sample labeling issues or sample mix up 
because a sequence from one of the California human patients 
(California/192/2024) definitely groups with the D1.1 clade for the PB2 
gene sequence, but the NA and H5 gene sequences group with the B3.13 
genotype.

NA phylogeny:
https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-NA-tree/H5N1_NA_subsampled_tree_US_20250302.pdf
PB2 phylogeny:
https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-PB2-tree/H5N1_PB2_subsampled_tree_US_20250302.pdf


Ron Okimoto