Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH --- Correct Emulation Defined
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:10:24 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <vrjog0$1ilbe$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrgme1$2tr56$1@dont-email.me>
 <vri5mn$6nv4$1@dont-email.me>
 <8354fe5751e03a767452a3999818d5c6da714a6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vrigh6$f35v$1@dont-email.me> <vrj6d3$14iuu$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:10:25 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12f6cf3e875cd6439bcd99f3842832d3";
	logging-data="1660270"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UXzXLGqb/AvA+uFpd8Nbi"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3MPp2+X7KrWAPgKZtNqzA4zk/CQ=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250321-2, 3/21/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vrj6d3$14iuu$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3147

On 3/21/2025 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2025-03-21 01:48:22 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 3/20/2025 8:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 3/20/25 6:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/20/2025 4:16 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-03-20 02:32:43 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> DDD()
>>>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
>>>>>> [00002183] c3         ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When N steps of DDD are emulated by HHH according
>>>>>> to the semantics of the x86 language then these
>>>>>> N steps are emulated correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> That does not make much sense to define the correct emulation of 
>>>>> DDD as
>>>>> it should mean whatever "correct emulation" means when applied to DDD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Althouth promised otherwise on the subject line the meaning of "DDD
>>>>> correctly emulated by HHH" when N is not specified is not defined.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> N in this context always means any element of the
>>>> set of natural numbers.
>>>
>>> Then HHH isn't a specific program, and you are admitting that you 
>>> "logic" is just based on FRAUD.
>>>
>>
>> We have been over this same thing too many times.
> 
> You are right. But you can't figure out how to avoid that.
> 

I explained that in the part you ignored.
When I fully answer a question endlessly
repeating the same question after it has been
fully answered is not acceptable.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer