Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH --- Correct Emulation Defined 2
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:13:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vrl2s6$2nttr$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrgme1$2tr56$1@dont-email.me>
 <vri5mn$6nv4$1@dont-email.me>
 <8354fe5751e03a767452a3999818d5c6da714a6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vrigh6$f35v$1@dont-email.me> <vrj6d3$14iuu$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrjog0$1ilbe$6@dont-email.me>
 <db8aa67218b2a0990cd1df38aca29dbd3930e145@i2pn2.org>
 <vrkumg$2l2ci$2@dont-email.me>
 <ba957e964c1090cbb801b1688b951ac095281737@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 02:13:43 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1438e1cf2a9c866560bbb71c914d5ccd";
	logging-data="2881467"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0xSTsfXHrOd4HiepDQzT1"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bQLMlJgCbbjCU3M19jTm5LRhcAI=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250321-4, 3/21/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ba957e964c1090cbb801b1688b951ac095281737@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 2618

On 3/21/2025 7:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 3/21/25 8:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> DDD()
>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> [0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
>> [00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
>> [00002183] c3         ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>
>> For every HHH at machine address 000015d2 that emulates
>> a finite number of steps of DDD according to the
>> semantics of the x86 programming language no DDD
>> ever reaches its own "ret" instruction halt state.
>>
> 
> So, you demonstrate your utter stupidity and use of incorrect definitions.
> 
> For EVERY HHH at machine address 000015d2 that emulates just a finite 
> number of steps and return, then the PROGRAM DDD 

does not exist because HHH is invoked from main()


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer