Article <vrmiu0$63ft$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<vrmiu0$63ft$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Kestrel Clayton <richZIG.e.clayZIGton@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: The Big Crunch may be a possibility
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 10:53:53 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 103
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vrmiu0$63ft$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vri1js$3l1k$1@dont-email.me> <vri4oq$5far$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrjt5c$1n1mk$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="79989"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IO1zDRkUtafTWcDlefSUcJBbheg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vrjt5c$1n1mk$1@dont-email.me>
	DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 8082

On 21-Mar-25 10:30, RonO wrote:
> On 3/20/2025 5:27 PM, Kestrel Clayton wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20-Mar-25 17:33, RonO wrote:
>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/dark-energy-changing- 
>>> understanding-rcna197386
>>>
>>> Dark energy may be waning, and the acceleration of our galaxies may 
>>> one day end.
>>
>> That's interesting. I couldn't tell from the Berkeley Lab public 
>> release whether this new data suggest the rate of expansion is 
>> dropping, or if the acceleration of the rate of expansion is 
>> decreasing (instead of increasing, which is the current consensus). In 
>> other words, is it slowing down, or just not speeding up quite as fast?
>>
>>> What would happen after the big crunch?  Would all the matter in the 
>>> universe eventually fall into one large black hole?  How much matter 
>>> can a black hole contain before something like the Big Bang happens? 
>>> There is already "evaporation" from black holes.  Would anything send 
>>> the evaporation out of control?  Could anything like a Big Bang occur 
>>> within a black hole to create a new universe within the event horizon?
>>
>> I'm fairly out of date on this, but before the discovery of dark 
>> energy, the consensus was that the universe is either flat, or so 
>> close to spherical as to be indistinguishable. That would indicate the 
>> expansion of the universe would eventually halt, but the universe 
>> would not really collapse. Instead, given enough time, the stars would 
>> all burn out, all protons would eventually decay, and even the black 
>> holes would evaporate, until all that remains are photons, electrons, 
>> and some other, weirder particles. (However, I know photon decay is 
>> currently considered less certain a prospect than in the 1990s, so YMMV.)
>>
>> Everything collapsing into a massive black hole still seems unlikely, 
>> but if it did, that would simply be a different route to the photon 
>> age. Eventually energy states are so low that quantum phenomena become 
>> the biggest movers and shakers in the universe, and after that... we 
>> really don't know. It's simply off the map, as far as modern physics 
>> goes.
>>
>> Fascinating stuff. Thank you for sharing the article!
>>
> 
> Google thinks that there might be enough dark matter and regular matter 
> in the universe so that the collapse would happen if the expansion stops.

That's very interesting. Like I said, I'm somewhat out of date; it has 
been a very long time since I was a physics student in uni.

> One science article that I read recently noted that inflation predicted 
> that there are parts of the universe that would not be visible to the 
> Webb telescope.  The fringe of our universe expanded away so fast that 
> there would be a sort of event horizon past which light has not reached 
> us inside the visible universe.  Sounds weird, but is all matter further 
> away than that horizon, part of the calculations about whether the 
> universe will collapse or not?

That is an excellent question! The answer is "Sort of. It depends."

Because space itself is expanding, some things are receding away from us 
at what appears, from our local frame of reference, to be faster than 
the speed of light. This also implies the existence of matter so far 
away that light from it could never reach us, even given infinite time. 
This matter is beyond the cosmic event horizon (sometimes called the 
Hubble volume, though that's not quite the same thing) and it is, in a 
very real sense, in a different universe.

The really wiggy and cool thing here is it means we have infinite 
overlapping universes, since any point in space has a different cosmic 
event horizon. If, for example, the radius of the cosmic event horizon 
is 7, that means point 1 and point 10 are in separate universes, but 5 
is in BOTH of those universes, and 5's universe includes both points 1 
and 10 (although not all of 1's universe or 10's universe).

If the expansion of space due to dark energy never drops to zero, then 
any point that has left your cosmic event horizon is forever beyond your 
reach. Even given infinite time, a photon from you can never reach that 
point, because the expansion of space is causing it to recede faster 
than the photon travels. It is outside your universe.

On the other hand... if the expansion of the universe will eventually 
cease, there is no cosmic event horizon, since any given photon has an 
infinite time to get anywhere, and no point can recede from that photon 
faster than the photon's speed.

Thus, to answer your question above: Although things outside our current 
cosmic event horizon cannot be affected by gravity HERE, mass between 
here and there tugs on both of us, dragging us together. So 1 isn't 
pulling on 10, but both are pulling on 5, and 5 is pulling on both.

Further, if the universe eventually collapses, that means things that 
are currently outside our observable universe will eventually re-enter 
our bubble, as gravity drags things that left our cosmic event horizon, 
or were always outside our cosmic event horizon, back into our universe.

Cool stuff. I love physics!

-- 
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Kestrel Clayton
"Every normal woman must be tempted, at times, to stoke the fire,
host the black mass, and begin eating hearts." — Rose Bailey