Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with
 Einstein's 1905 SR.
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 22:45:01 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 78
Message-ID: <vrnaon$qvt2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <8d05bbe123c740f2934b31e367a92231@www.novabbs.com>
 <65006a73bc196736fbec3d54e21fa717@www.novabbs.com>
 <vr9tmf$q4vi$1@dont-email.me>
 <0c0b2bb49434e61879858abed2b9d6c2@www.novabbs.com>
 <vrbtgj$2k1q7$1@dont-email.me>
 <a1b3bbfca4b1e9797d98903a77f0cf59@www.novabbs.com>
 <f58a6ba75e73908078c5576f74ffe329@www.novabbs.com>
 <9ed9e92086e0d99fde7d81edfced643a@www.novabbs.com>
 <0082c223a6c8e6952b11ec32b83c473b@www.novabbs.com>
 <d38ac7fb8de3a1e3c8f08908a6e1953a@www.novabbs.com>
 <40f0e2c10ed1e2c2d24989b4c7917802@www.novabbs.com>
 <vrf73v$1iffb$1@dont-email.me>
 <c6032fd09dd139befbdfc8b5d8b477b6@www.novabbs.com>
 <vri0qb$30cv$1@dont-email.me>
 <43d5f4c5dc0bb6403360e6d899866f5b@www.novabbs.com>
 <vrkf9c$27thi$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff75915451d5dea06c892117592601ba@www.novabbs.com>
 <182ef1e1d815cc2c$90977$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <19aa8bd869684b7743e65dc78b07c7a1@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 22:40:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="887ef451b9a8aaca8790df744d47b145";
	logging-data="884642"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Pq7aKxhYkjyvSivqKFOJz"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PKt241wDuwGiDQgtLgwiKYffinc=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <19aa8bd869684b7743e65dc78b07c7a1@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 4898

Den 21.03.2025 23:59, skrev rhertz:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 22:27:40 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> 
>>
>> To fulfill the prophecy of the idiot -
>> the clock should be left alone, without
>> any corrections. GPS wouldn't work, but
>> what a magnificient symmetry we would
>> have instead.
> 
> 
> I agree with the comment about that clocks should be left alone. THEY
> ARE, and the stupid myth that relativistic corrections are required is
> just that, A MYTH.

Nice to see that you have found a friend to share your misconceptions
with.

> 
> Plus, another observation: It's claimed by relativists that, thanks to
> that correction, the received L1 carrier on any GPS receiver ALLOWS to
> recover the
> master TCXO frequency of 10.23000000 Mhz, which is used to CORRECT the
> frequency of the ordinary crystal oscillator of the GPS receiver, so it
> can TIME the arrival of the MARKS.

ROFL

Definitely one of you better misconception!

Do you really, seriously believe that 'relativists' claim that
the receiver can measure the frequency of the L1 carrier to be
1575.42 MHz = 154*10.23 MHz and can use this to recover the
master TCXO frequency of 10.23000000 Mhz? :-D

You claim to be an engineer and must understand that it is
no way a GPS receiver can measure the L1 frequency with any precision
better than ~ 1575420000 ±150 Hz.

But you believe that 'relativists' claim they can measure the frequency 
of L1 to be 1575420000 ±0.025 Hz!

Those 'relativists' of yours are really stupid, aren't they? :-D

> 
> What is curious is that the MYTH of the 38.5 us compensation (calculated
> via Schwarzchild for ONE SATELLITE) is enough to explain WHY
> RELATIVISTIC GPS WORKS.
> 
> But, in the REAL WORLD, even the cheapest GPS receiver use the L1 signal
> OF FOUR SATELLITES, at any given instant. The line of sight RECEIVER-
> GPS SV is tilted wrt the tangent of the orbital path, and last only a
> short time at a valid angle of +/- 40° with respect to the projection of
> the Earth's radius above your head, After that time, the receiver
> engages with OTHER GPS SV.
> 
> I wonder how the retarded relativists explain the impact of each of the
> daily 38.5 usec applied to FOUR SATELLITES, being that the angle of
> reception is extremely variable and last only a few minutes.
> 
> All what you read is the fucking explanation about ONE SATELLITE and its
> effect on the error in alignment, DISMISSING the complex matrix based
> math of trilateration.
> 
> But, I guess, details are much less important than REPEAT AS A PARROT
> the same shit for decades.

Good grief!

You have discussed the GPS for several decades in this forum, and you
have still not the faintest idea of how the GPS works.

Well done to keep your ignorance for so long time, Richard. :-D

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/