| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vrndvt$tr7i$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!nntp.terraraq.uk!news1.firedrake.org!news.xcski.com!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: California dairies infected in Jan. 2024? Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:35:23 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 173 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vrndvt$tr7i$1@dont-email.me> References: <vrhs2c$3ut85$1@dont-email.me> <vrkf8d$27t11$1@dont-email.me> <vrn149$ihdn$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="91007"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:HNDU5s2r8umq1sq9J0HyctRrXLU= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 7DBE822978C; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 18:35:56 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADCC229783 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 18:35:54 -0400 (EDT) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 52MMZips2065314 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:35:45 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA1860610 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 22:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/1BA1860610; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id D5BE8DC01CA; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:35:42 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 23:35:42 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/VxrXdohtCzqy9jSm91QZQURNb2bxpdP0= In-Reply-To: <vrn149$ihdn$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org On 3/22/2025 1:56 PM, RonO wrote: > On 3/21/2025 2:38 PM, RonO wrote: >> On 3/20/2025 2:59 PM, RonO wrote: >>> https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-HA-tree/ >>> H5N1_HA_subsampled_tree_US_20250302.pdf >> >> https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-HA-tree/ >> H5N1_HA_subsampled_tree_US_20250320.pdf >> >> The old links get discontinued and new ones get put up. >> >> https://gisaid.org/resources/gisaid-in-the-news/highly-pathogenic- >> avian- influenza-outbreak-in-the-united-states/ >> >> This page is stable and you can access the 3 gene phylogenies from here. >> >> The new H5 tree seems to have had only one D1.1 sequence added and it >> pulled the outlier (A/Texas/37/2024) onto its own branch this differs >> from the previous tree. My take is that they should remove the A/ >> Texas/37/2024 sample from the analysis and see where the node actually >> is that separates the wild bird B3.13 genotype from the dairy >> infection. Just going by relative sequence divergence it looks like >> the node may fall within or closer to the California sequences. The >> amount of divergence of the California sequences indicated that the >> virus was circulating within the California herds before Texas and the >> other states got infected. The early 2024 Idaho infections are much >> closer to the Michigan, Minnesota and Colorado sequences (all likely >> infected by Michigan strains) than they are to the California >> sequences. The herd that they tracked to Idaho from California and >> claimed that the virus was similar to California (that October Idaho >> sequence is not included in the phylogeny) were likely infected by the >> California herd, and the Idaho cattle likely did not infect the >> California cows that returned to California. The Idaho herds >> confirmed to be infected from May to July 2024 are a very different >> sequence than the California H5 sequence, and the Idaho infection >> would likely not have changed as much by Sept. to infect California >> with it's own clade so different from the Texas sequences that the >> previous Idaho sequences evolved from. >> >> My prediction is that California may have been the first state >> infected by the dairy virus, but they were just in denial and never >> self reported the disease until the cows started dying in the summer >> heat. >> >> Ron Okimoto >> >>> >>> This is a phylogeny of the HA gene segment. It is for the H5 Asian >>> allele that is found in both the B3.13 dairy genotype and the D1.1 >>> wild bird genotype that has started to be found in dairy cattle. >>> >>> The B3.13 H5 sequence is at the top of the phylogeny and the D1.1 H5 >>> sequence is below and includes the Washington poultry worker (A/ >>> Washington/240/2024|2024-10-18). A/Nevada/10/2025|2025-02-04 is a >>> recent D1.1 dairy infection. The H5 sequence came into the US in >>> 2022, but the D1.1 and B3.13 alleles of the H5 gene may have >>> separated before getting to the US. They don't have any sequences >>> from 2022 so I can't tell. >>> >>> The bogus way that the USDA labels their sequences inhibits >>> interpretation of the phylogeny. The USDA only gives the collection >>> date and sequencing date, and lists the location as USA. GISAID >>> seems to try to infer the location by the date of sequencing and >>> press releases about those dates. If they can't infer the location >>> they leave it as USA which is useless for epidemiology within the US. >>> >>> It looks like the Iowa and Wisconsin patients were infected with a >>> D1.3 genotype closely related to D1.1. The Washington, Oregon, >>> Wyoming, and Louisiana patients seem to have been infected with >>> different strains of D1.1. But all the D1.1 and D1.3 H5 alleles seem >>> to come from a clade that may have branched off in 2022-2023. >>> >>> Something is strange about the B3.13 genotype H5 alleles. It has >>> been known that the first human patient in Texas with the B3.13 >>> genotype was a sequence outlier compared to all the other dairy >>> sequences. A/ Texas/37/2024|2024-03-28 still falls outside of all the >>> other dairy sequences, but it now groups with a mountain lion from >>> Montana, and a wild bird from Wyoming. For the NA gene sequence the >>> Texas patient is within the dairy clade instead of out side of it and >>> is most closely related to the Missouri and Michigan human patients. >>> The Texas H5 sequence may just have multiple mutations that occurred >>> during the infection of that individual. The mountain lion and wild >>> bird N1 sequences continue to fall outside of the dairy clade. My >>> take is that this means that the Texas patient H5 sequence should not >>> be trusted in trying to figure out the source of the dairy infection. >>> >>> One thing to note is that all the California H5 sequence dairy >>> infections are a separate clade that looks significantly different >>> from other dairy infections. Their sequences are also more variable >>> than those more closely related to the Texas B3.13 H5 sequences. It >>> looks like the infection has been in California for a lot longer than >>> when it was first detected late last year. For some reason there >>> seems to have been sequence evolution before California was infected >>> or after the first few herds were infected, possibly, before Texas >>> was detected in March 2024. They need to redo their estimated time >>> of divergence for the dairy B3.13 genotype. A full genome sequence >>> comparison is likely needed to figure out how California fits in with >>> the spread of the dairy virus. California commercial poultry farms >>> started to go down in the central valley in October/November 2023 >>> when it was estimated that the dairy virus entered into dairy cattle. >>> Because of the stupid way that the USDA labels their sequences I >>> could not tell which ones came from California last year, and I was >>> told that the USDA did not give out the names of the researchers >>> involved in the sequencing so that I could ask them to identify the >>> California samples from 2023. >>> >>> The PB2 data may have some sample labeling issues or sample mix up >>> because a sequence from one of the California human patients >>> (California/192/2024) definitely groups with the D1.1 clade for the >>> PB2 gene sequence, but the NA and H5 gene sequences group with the >>> B3.13 genotype. >>> >>> NA phylogeny: >>> https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-NA-tree/ >>> H5N1_NA_subsampled_tree_US_20250302.pdf >>> PB2 phylogeny: >>> https://gisaid.org/fileadmin/c/gisaid/files/H5N1-PB2-tree/ >>> H5N1_PB2_subsampled_tree_US_20250302.pdf >>> >>> >>> Ron Okimoto >>> >> > https://gisaid.org/phylogeny-influenza/hpai-h5n1-usa/ > > GISAID has a full genome phylogeny that indicates that A/Texas/37/2024 > is likely causing incorrect rooting of the dairy virus. They should > likely take that sequence out of the phylogentic analysis. As crazy as > it may seem the GISAID has evidence that California dairies and poultry > farms were infected by the B3.13 genotype before Texas. I do not know > the reason for them not to have disclosed this by now. There are 4 > dairy samples and 3 chicken samples collected in California Jan. 2024. > They would precede the Texas infections by a couple months. The Jan > 2024 samples have much shorter branch lengths than the other California > genomes. This would be expected if they had been collected before the > other California samples that were all collected after August 2024. Even > though they have shorter branch lengths they all nest within the other > California B3.13 sequences which form their own clade with more sequence > variation than is found in the virus that infected Texas and Michigan. > The phylogeny indicates that the virus has been evolving in California > for longer than it has in the dairies infected with the Texas strain. > > Ron Okimoto > > I do not know how long they have known that California had been infected > by Jan 2024. I have tried to find the sequences claimed to be collected Jan 2024, but nothing comes up when I search for the claimed USDA name. I did find a sequence using only the number 037824-003. It may be a sample labeling ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========