Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:05:29 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vrpbg8$2n6vl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <D3Wdna5Sf9VVoEP6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <zLqdnYn5HIaY60L6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vrp3h9$2c3uj$1@dont-email.me>
 <xVCdndBZ0M8Nu336nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vrpa9o$2gelp$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:05:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b265737c59eb3acffaf394766377ae82";
	logging-data="2857973"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zrk1Czsv22COHpLvY5MGwnU95HfMSm7M="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pWdBfzqPwVD17zVCvDtq0FuGf+I=
Content-Language: en-GB, it
In-Reply-To: <vrpa9o$2gelp$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2611

On 23/03/2025 16:44, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On 23/03/2025 16:19, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 03/23/2025 06:49 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2025 03:46, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
>> Sort of like W.H.F. Barnes or R.G. Collingwood, yet really for
>> both Kant and Hegel, who both had both a strong analytical
>> and thoroughly idealistic course, has that Quine's wrestling
>> with concepts of logical paradox, never sees him quite win,
>> which can only result from resolving them.
> 
> I do have given you a/the resolution, then you keep calling
> *me* an/the idealist.  Indeed, if all you have is a/that
> hammer, ideally then materially, *and* not giving it up.
> 
>> Thanks for your reply, and please explain how there can be
>> a true theory overall at all, vis-a-vis some ideal Comenius
>> language and our mere human inter-subjective Coleridge language,
>> that there is one at all results from plain reason.
> 
> You are welcome.  The short answer there is: your question
> is as ill-founded as your "philosophy" (your dictionary and
> index); indeed, who said Logic is about "ultimate truth(s?)"?

But I had already given you the long answer, and it's neither
the Devine language, nor the Babel's tower:
<https://seprogrammo.blogspot.com/2024/01/on-logic-of-it.html>

> Related: what is Philosophy?

Can you read at all?  ;)

-Julio