Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: The First Swedes
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:06:45 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <vrpt57$37u0f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vrn09n$hp63$1@dont-email.me> <vrpbg9$2n1ei$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrpefl$2pm5t$1@dont-email.me> <vrpkvl$2vcb8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrpmvr$31qoj$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:06:48 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6de305dcd38f3c0377775d4b448bdc59";
	logging-data="3405839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19M5EWxJSwqifXDmVWpYgH1ccp2uz8cai8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IiSwYZz5HWdUrx7ojwVoesY63xA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vrpmvr$31qoj$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5242

On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>         State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
>>>>>>>>>>     HISTORY OF
>>>>>>>>>>         SWEDEN.
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>         This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
>>>>>>>>>>   the first
>>>>>>>>>>         Swedes:
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>         No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
>>>>>>>>> further and
>>>>>>>>>         further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
>>>>>>>>>         lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>         I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
>>>>>>>>       lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
>>>>>>>     evolved
>>>>>>>       lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>       high northern latitudes.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
>>>>>>>   post-Ice
>>>>>>>       Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
>>>>>>>       overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
>>>>>>>   farmers, and
>>>>>>>       later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics
>>>>>>>       tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
>>>>>>>     spanning
>>>>>>>       2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
>>>>>>> influences from
>>>>>>>     the
>>>>>>>       eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
>>>>>>>     indication
>>>>>>>       of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
>>>>>>     arrived.  And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
>>>>>>     pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
>>>>>>     I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal.  Nevertheless,
>>>>>>     afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
>>>>> across the
>>>>>     globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
>>>>> were all
>>>>>     really black all along.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture
>>>>>     everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic
>>>>>     mistake that needs to be corrected.
>>>>
>>>>   I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
>>>   
>>>   I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
>>
>> What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
> 
> I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.

That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'?  Do elaborate...