| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vrpuki$38s29$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nick <ddantgwyn@mail.ru> Newsgroups: soc.culture.bulgaria Subject: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic =?UTF-8?B?Q0/igoItR2xvYmFs?= Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions =?UTF-8?B?4oCm?= Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 21:32:02 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 46 Message-ID: <vrpuki$38s29$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:32:02 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3114a647ac1159c5328e93b20a2de52b"; logging-data="3436617"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/vZRVlfslasXTUJQLrzZB" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba git@gitlab.gnome.org:GNOME/pan.git) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gGeFmmKNxk9X5txDhba5g2wDs6s= Bytes: 3570 A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V5-1.pdf Abstract The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO₂ emissions, asserting that these emissions have driven approximately 1 Wm⁻² of net radiative forcing since 1750, resulting in a global temperature rise of 0.8- 1.1°C. This conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs from global climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a rigorous evaluation of these assertions by juxtaposing them against unadjusted observational data and synthesizing findings from recent peer- reviewed literature. Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible longterm atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments. We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms. Keywords: Global warming; climate change; climate modeling; atmospheric CO2; residence time; future CO2 scenarios; IPCC; total solar irradiance (TSI) Submitted 2025-03-06, Accepted 2025-03-18. https://doi.org/10.53234/ SCC202501/06 Май всички твърдения на неолиберализма започват да се опровергават ;) -- «地 球 誕 生 在 牛 市 的 小 時 — Earth is born in the Bull's hour»