Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrpuki$38s29$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Nick <ddantgwyn@mail.ru>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bulgaria
Subject: A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic
 =?UTF-8?B?Q0/igoItR2xvYmFs?= Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence
 Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions =?UTF-8?B?4oCm?=
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 21:32:02 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <vrpuki$38s29$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:32:02 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3114a647ac1159c5328e93b20a2de52b";
	logging-data="3436617"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/vZRVlfslasXTUJQLrzZB"
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba git@gitlab.gnome.org:GNOME/pan.git)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gGeFmmKNxk9X5txDhba5g2wDs6s=
Bytes: 3570

A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming 
Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing 
Assumptions

https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V5-1.pdf

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed
climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO₂ emissions, asserting 
that these emissions have driven approximately 1 Wm⁻² of net radiative 
forcing since 1750, resulting in a global temperature rise of 0.8-
1.1°C. This conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs 
from global climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model 
Intercomparison Project (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a 
rigorous evaluation of these assertions by juxtaposing them against 
unadjusted observational data and synthesizing findings from recent peer-
reviewed literature. Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, 
constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural 
fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating 
negligible longterm atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 
(2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs 
consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea 
ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared 
to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on 
a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, 
despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability 
options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data 
adjustments.

We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks 
empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as 
temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental 
reevaluation of current climate paradigms.

Keywords: Global warming; climate change; climate modeling; atmospheric 
CO2; residence time; future CO2 scenarios; IPCC; total solar irradiance 
(TSI) 

Submitted 2025-03-06, Accepted 2025-03-18. https://doi.org/10.53234/
SCC202501/06

Май всички твърдения на неолиберализма започват да се опровергават ;)

-- 
«地 球 誕 生 在 牛 市 的 小 時 — Earth is born in the Bull's hour»