Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: efji <efji@efi.efji>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Collatz conjecture question
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:38:17 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <vrr5lp$g34g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vrnt34$199cq$1@dont-email.me> <vron6n$23ve9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrpr97$2n9lu$1@dont-email.me>
 <j4ecneBTbq93EH36nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vrq7cn$3hsgc$1@dont-email.me>
 <e5adnQPxQcNeJH36nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:38:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1d9c39a2a126441d970fcee92a03ddf7";
	logging-data="527504"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185Sep894layWZclZOap6Zr"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:N+usRxNS3Lhb/bYse2YvQOFBU8I=
Content-Language: fr, en-US
In-Reply-To: <e5adnQPxQcNeJH36nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>

Le 24/03/2025 à 02:47, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 03/23/2025 05:01 PM, efji wrote:
>> Le 23/03/2025 à 23:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> There are models of integers with and without Szmeredi's theorem,
>>> it's _independent_ usual laws of small numbers since there are
>>> multiple models of integers, and of course a neat, simple, direct
>>> logical argument that there's no standard model of integers,
>>> only fragments and extensions.
>>
>> In summary: we have Hachel with his dumb "complex numbers", now an
>> inventor of "multiple models of integers". Let's just find some genius
>> of "new real numbers" and we could form a team in the psychiatric
>> hospital :)
>>
>> BTW, I just found the homepage of a unfortunate guy named "Ross
>> Finlayson". He his forced to have the following disclaimer: "I am not
>> the "Ross A. Finlayson" who posts prolifically to the "sci.math" and
>> "sci.space.policy" newsgroups. We’re not related".
>>
>> Imagine a real person named "Richard Hachel" :(
>>
> 
> Yeah, it's been like that since about 20 years.
> It's one of the oldest unchanged pages still on the Internet.
> 
> Wow, you sound just like "infinite foul toot J.G.".
> 
> 
> Finlay Mor was killed in the 14'th century at
> the Battle of Pinkie by a cannonball.
> 
> Somewhere, in Scot-land, there's a
> Lone Highlander's Grave.
> 
> I don't know that we're related, ....
> 
> 
> 
> Dig a little deeper and start finding my
> tens and tens of thousands of posts.
> 
> And a long, long line.
> 
> 
> 
> Hachel's just talking about iterating roots,
> it's just a thing, whereas my talk about
> complex numbers is about gaps in the analyticity
> of the usual association of the Argand diagram,
> and about how division is under-defined, and,
> there are others, and about my original analysis
> with the "identity dimension" the envelope of
> the integral equations of d'Alembert, Clairaut,
> and the linear fractional equation.
> 
> Which is very close to diffraction,
> a fraction of differences.
> 
> 
> Anyways, indeed it is so that there's reasoning
> why Russell's retro-thesis, is, generously, an
> unjustified stipulation, and, is, a bit more directly,
> justified against.
> 
> 
> 
> Tens and tens of thousands of essays in mathematics,
> logic, and physics, in the short essay form.
> 
> 
> Also there are thousands and thousands of volumes
> in my library, or, a ton of books.
> 
> 
> So anyways, do you know of Mirimanoff and his role
> in the influences of the development of ZF set theory?
> Have you read Cohen's on the independence of CH?
> 
> Do you have a clue? (Without asking your phone, ....)
> 
> Have you ever said the word "metaphysics" or strung
> together "point at infinity"?
> 
> 
> Others have, ....
> 
> 

Two distinct pathologies. Hachel is struggling against himself about 
basic and elementary notions. You are more a "name dropping guy", 
chaining savant words in a random way. I suggest giving you the same 
room in the psychiatric hospital. He could teach you how
a=b =/=> a^2=b^2, and you could teach him a lot of strange words whose 
definition is far above your head but make you feel that your are the 
smartest guy on earth. Who will win between you two ?


-- 
F.J.