| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vrsgsq$1m2ti$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Cop has no qualified immunity in detention of... fireman Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 20:55:54 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <vrsgsq$1m2ti$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:55:59 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="15ad516ff661573d7ed0c0415e517d50"; logging-data="1772466"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0v3MLNuzDJPIIBkqGvNFvndT09iLWjYg=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:4m2uQ+w88KFWI+F00TOK64fH/dM= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Only in California! Stupidest facts ever. There was a multi-vehicle collision on a California expressway. Firemen from the closest municipal fire department responded to assist with traumatic injuries; there was no fire. As they are trained to do, they used the firetruck to block traffic lanes so that firemen/paramedics could work safely in traffic lanes treating the injured. This makes sense, right? Well, not to CHP. Once again we see how far a once respected police agency has fallen since the days of Ponch and Jon. One patrol officer got the firemen to move some of the vehicles to partly reopen the highway, but the engineer (driver) of the remaining fire truck refused to move it as it was the sole barrier to the other firemen and injured. The other patrol officer seeing that the fireman wasn't complying with the first patrol officer "took charge" by taking that fireman into custody. The state law is unclear about who is in charge between firemen and police in this scenario, but I think the state legislature expected everybody to behave like adults and a law wasn't required. Now, CHP has concerns about secondary accidents 'cuz motorists get impatient and stupid, but regardless, if the injured are still on the pavement being treated, first duty appears to be protecting their lives and the firemen treating them. Right? CHP insisted on taking this to court to preserve qualified immunity for themselves because the fireman sued. Anyway, the ninth circuit upheld the district court that qualified immunity doesn't apply. I was actually impressed that the state appellate attorney found a way to make some arguments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC4onWtwjfQ