| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vs1afg$24nub$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:37:04 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <vs1afg$24nub$2@dont-email.me> References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me> <vrdhok$47cb$2@dont-email.me> <20250319115550.0000676f@yahoo.com> <vreuj1$1asii$4@dont-email.me> <vreve4$19klp$2@dont-email.me> <20250319201903.00005452@yahoo.com> <86r02roqdq.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrh1br$35029$2@dont-email.me> <LRUCP.2$541.0@fx47.iad> <vrh71t$3be42$1@dont-email.me> <KFVCP.594649$SZca.498578@fx13.iad> <vrhb77$3frk8$1@dont-email.me> <vrru8f$174q6$1@dont-email.me> <86o6xpk8sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrtmu4$2s1q2$1@dont-email.me> <20250325011327.41@kylheku.com> <20250325131110.000056bd@yahoo.com> <86bjtpjp22.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vruid4$3iuvq$1@dont-email.me> <87iknw7sz8.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vs0e6r$1avlb$2@dont-email.me> <87sen05cza.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vs0olv$1lodm$1@dont-email.me> <vs14p5$20ejf$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:37:05 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e00a15ae379d2cae7edd65ac25a9709"; logging-data="2252747"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nuYtb3GRhAWHhEMPe2CJ+lMHMcdQa9AA=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:tDkSD0c7B+d5iVp77qI9nO5MkC8= In-Reply-To: <vs14p5$20ejf$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2806 On 26/03/2025 15:59, Janis Papanagnou wrote: > On 26.03.2025 12:33, David Brown wrote: >> >> Even in C (in a desperate attempt to bring us back on topic for the >> group), there are no negative integer constants - merely positive >> integer constants with a unary minus operator applied. > > Is that so? (Harmlessly asking.) - I mean, if I write int x = -5; > does it matter (in "C") whether its parsed as <integer number> or > <negation> <positive number> ? > I can't think off-hand of any situation in which it would matter, but maybe others can. (It's also worth noting that there were changes in the way integer constants were typed between C90 and C99 - though usually the differences are harmless.) > I faintly recall a discussion, I think in context of exponentiation. > > But I don't want to (re-)open a can of words... > Too late for that!