Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:37:40 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vs1hhj$2bn9k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vrf5bp$1gcun$1@dont-email.me>
 <b3730bf7-bcd1-4698-b465-6d6ef190b29d@att.net> <vrgm1k$2s8c6$2@dont-email.me>
 <c81100d7-9354-4c8e-b216-e147cab9b41c@att.net> <vrhrlb$3ta8t$1@dont-email.me>
 <c0de7504-7d17-42f1-83e8-8767c0859c0c@att.net> <vrj5nh$12273$1@dont-email.me>
 <efbe60c5-6691-4fd6-8638-589fd95ec8a4@att.net> <vrkabi$233at$1@dont-email.me>
 <f32ed217-7f7d-4e03-8a10-58fc26cbbb50@att.net> <vrlvah$3khef$1@dont-email.me>
 <555d7095-81a0-4576-adac-f2aa8327f4df@att.net> <vrpg35$2q4gr$1@dont-email.me>
 <8397e10f-36cb-43c6-8d2b-e4d20809ee83@att.net> <vrpo4r$3002f$3@dont-email.me>
 <4b83f1c2-c16f-40b4-a5b6-68991e3c230c@att.net> <vrsc49$1gv1c$2@dont-email.me>
 <440ff556-a769-482e-ad2a-064af14c5781@att.net> <vrulap$3l4i0$2@dont-email.me>
 <369e62e9-93e6-4256-96ed-f9d8489aa017@att.net> <vrv307$3vgl7$4@dont-email.me>
 <5004d400-7c2e-4d59-ad66-5986a416ef89@att.net> <vrv9oe$8plq$3@dont-email.me>
 <411d5c64-ddb6-4655-a264-2149d054ff7d@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:37:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3c2cfcb752e949c3c0583adcbb042fde";
	logging-data="2481460"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tOBjSIReYdeL3296eadVKxtUzajKabDA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hhxyNGQGZdBtqKRJ0ovvNTYUS6Q=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <411d5c64-ddb6-4655-a264-2149d054ff7d@att.net>

On 26.03.2025 07:24, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 3/25/2025 6:12 PM, WM wrote:
>> On 25.03.2025 21:26, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> On 3/25/2025 4:17 PM, WM wrote:
>>>> On 25.03.2025 18:46, Jim Burns wrote:
> 
>>>>> It's the same way in which we know that
>>>>> a square has four corners
>>>>
>>>> and that losslvvess exchanges are lossless.
>>>
>>> and that a set larger than
>>> any set different.sized.by.one from other sets
>>> is not
>>> any set different.sized.by.one from other sets. 
>>
>> Irrelevant.
>> Your waffle does not change basic logic.
> 
> A set larger than
> any set for which my waffle does not change basic WM.logic
> is
> a set for which my waffle changes basic WM.logic.

Nothing of that kind does exist. "WM-logic" says that lossless exchanges 
at finite steps are lossless and is the foundation of rational thinking.

Regards, WM