Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vs2e67$35mlr$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:46:28 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <vs2e67$35mlr$1@dont-email.me> References: <vrru3v$152e3$3@dont-email.me> <B0kEP.112929$Xq5f.111799@fx38.iad> <f9k3ujl9ev5nopn2f329cuesca36o9c7j0@4ax.com> <vrskop$1qlue$1@dont-email.me> <vrt0d6$24h8c$2@dont-email.me> <m4f68uFpiqsU1@mid.individual.net> <ogu4ujpkvk3ck8tojoh6fkq5tbmkmh1oor@4ax.com> <vru3fn$31kv7$1@dont-email.me> <4s45uj1f7a09kdh5cuau8e2k37snjcm2g5@4ax.com> <vrudkh$3fet8$3@dont-email.me> <vruj8u$3i4m6$3@dont-email.me> <vrvmhi$j8eo$3@dont-email.me> <vs0m66$1h7oe$2@dont-email.me> <vs18m6$21gj2$2@dont-email.me> <vs1kob$26rhh$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 03:46:41 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43583353408941dab8079a9ce1f8861f"; logging-data="3332795"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5oDE9IHZJRbYUJ/iqR6DlkMoSGndjL/Q=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:sccmLhjU1T47RXVQyXApk/F3t/s= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vs1kob$26rhh$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2187 On 3/26/2025 3:32 PM, Zen Cycle wrote: > On 3/26/2025 12:06 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> >> On average, bicycling is safer than walking by all those metrics. You >> obviously don't believe that, > > I don't? My, how kunich-esque of you. Perhaps you should explicitly state your positions. As it is, you now seem to be implying that you do think bicycling is safer than walking. Yet you apparently think that bicyclists get great value from special protective hats, but pedestrians don't need them. Those two points seem inconsistent. So am I misinterpreting your views? What exactly are your views? -- - Frank Krygowski