Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vs42l4$mmcb$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Turing computable functions
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:41:56 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vs42l4$mmcb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vruvsn$3tamc$3@dont-email.me> <vs0b8d$19qb8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vs19qe$2346o$2@dont-email.me> <vs39ht$1ogp$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:41:57 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8fbd84b24c3af7ac080451312d40f885";
	logging-data="743819"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7hPEKJaiu3G/MQKFtFCtp"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VyCB0RujoD8rt1B0m3h0pNwzPqM=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250327-8, 3/27/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vs39ht$1ogp$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2527

On 3/27/2025 5:33 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 26.mrt.2025 om 17:25 schreef olcott:
>> On 3/26/2025 2:44 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-25 19:24:07 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> Cannot possibly derive any outputs not computed from
>>>> their inputs.
>>>>
>>>> A Turing machine halt decider cannot possibly report
>>>> on the behavior of any directly executing process.
>>>
>>> It can if that report is a computable function of their inputs.
>>> For example, whether the direct execution of another Turing machine
>>> is longer than 2 steps is Turing computable.
>>>
>>
>> When an input to a simulating termination analyzer
>> defines a pathological relationship to its simulating
>> termination analyzer this changes the behavior of this
>> input relative to its direct execution.

> If an analyser has a pathological relation with this input, it is wrong 
> to choose this analyser for this input. In particular when there are 
> analysers that do not have this relationship with this input.

It is the input that specifies the pathological relationship.
This means that you are saying that the analyzer should reject
this input.
-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer