| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vs6g7b$2mp5$1@news.muc.de> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!news.karotte.org!news.space.net!news.muc.de!.POSTED.news.muc.de!not-for-mail
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:45:47 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: muc.de e.V.
Message-ID: <vs6g7b$2mp5$1@news.muc.de>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <9e0c7e728f7de44e13450d7401fe65d36c5638f3@i2pn2.org> <vrpsaa$3708j$1@dont-email.me> <vrpud0$po9$2@news.muc.de> <vrsb4p$1gv1d$3@dont-email.me> <vrsgn5$1lg8$4@news.muc.de> <vrujtd$3l4hv$1@dont-email.me> <vrusi3$10kn$2@news.muc.de> <vrv3c4$3vgl8$1@dont-email.me> <vrves5$1507$1@news.muc.de> <vs1l08$2cnha$1@dont-email.me> <3449b34c60603bf59f694df42857003d0bda7ab5@i2pn2.org> <vs1o24$2c93u$2@dont-email.me> <vs1s4h$26e3$2@news.muc.de> <vs4blb$eulg$6@solani.org>
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:45:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.muc.de; posting-host="news.muc.de:2001:608:1000::2";
logging-data="88869"; mail-complaints-to="news-admin@muc.de"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
Bytes: 3129
Lines: 51
WM <invalid@no.org> wrote:
> Am 26.03.2025 um 22:38 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>> WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
>>> On 26.03.2025 21:06, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Wed, 26 Mar 2025 20:36:40 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>>>> The potential infinite is a variable finite. Cantor's actual infinity is
>>>>> not variable but fixed. (Therefore Hilbert's hotel is potential
>>>>> infinity.)
>>>> What we refer to as infinite isn't variable.
>>> The number of guests/rooms in Hilbert's hotel is infinite but can
>>> grow. That is variable infinity.
>> You are mistaken. (Countable) infinity stays the same when you add
>> finite and countably infinite numbers to it.
> That proves that cardinality is nonsense. When a new guest arrives,
> then the number of guests grows by 1.
Yes indeed. There were aleph-0 guests beforehand, the new guest arrives
growing that number by 1, giving aleph-0. Why do you find this so
difficult to understand?
>> Thus in Hilbert's hotel, although all the rooms are occupied, one of
>> these rooms can be vacated to make room for a new guest without
>> expelling an existing guest.
> Real fools are really delighted by counterintuitive results.
You've run out of mathematics, so you resort to ad hominem. Not very
good. Hint: the person who devised "Hilbert's hotel" was in no sense a
fool.
>> Adding that new guest doesn't change the number of guests in the
>> hotel, or the number of rooms required.
> Real fools are really delighted by counterintuitive results.
>> See many of Jim's posts over the last few days for details.
> There is only one important detail, namely that lossless exchanges
> cause losses. It is sufficient to reject every intelligent being.
An infinite process of lossless exchanges can cause loss, as we have
seen.
> Regards, WM
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).