Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vs6or0$2p360$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:12:49 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 111 Message-ID: <vs6or0$2p360$1@dont-email.me> References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrt3gv$264jb$4@dont-email.me> <448c82acff6b5fc1d2aa266be92df6f778ec2c6a@i2pn2.org> <vru5tp$38ob9$1@dont-email.me> <ac61f679d7ddb39b0ceaedd7f562899d36346535@i2pn2.org> <vrvccp$aq8m$3@dont-email.me> <e166831a8e02332d64ec151f61481e2629e6e53a@i2pn2.org> <vrvsh4$p4vd$2@dont-email.me> <c93030bbd81fb313c76c256c6e54beb48b07dfdd@i2pn2.org> <vs1vuv$2ot1m$1@dont-email.me> <d2f86fad6c5823e3c098f30d331576c52263b398@i2pn2.org> <vs2fgn$354gv$5@dont-email.me> <vs2u3v$3mcjm$2@dont-email.me> <vs434l$mmcb$3@dont-email.me> <vs45a3$resr$1@dont-email.me> <vs4ne1$1c1ja$1@dont-email.me> <vs4ovc$1e09p$1@dont-email.me> <vs4pg8$1c1ja$6@dont-email.me> <vs4pi9$1e09p$2@dont-email.me> <vs4qpp$1c1ja$7@dont-email.me> <vs4r2u$1e09p$3@dont-email.me> <vs4snt$1c1ja$9@dont-email.me> <vs4srl$1e09p$4@dont-email.me> <vs4tj3$1c1ja$11@dont-email.me> <vs4tot$1e09p$5@dont-email.me> <vs50dt$1c1ja$13@dont-email.me> <vs51po$1e09p$6@dont-email.me> <vs6nv4$39556$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 19:12:48 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="03fe113b48149dc853aaf379e67b2ca8"; logging-data="2919616"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WzUqCQbIWU0yeZo5BgAy6" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:xePVki1+1AaDwDK/rHHYAF2Y3SA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vs6nv4$39556$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 6508 On 3/28/2025 1:57 PM, olcott wrote: > On 3/27/2025 9:33 PM, dbush wrote: >> On 3/27/2025 10:10 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 3/27/2025 8:24 PM, dbush wrote: >>>> On 3/27/2025 9:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 3/27/2025 8:09 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>>> On 3/27/2025 9:07 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 7:38 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 8:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 7:12 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 8:11 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 7:02 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 7:36 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 1:27 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 1:50 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 2:18 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 27.mrt.2025 om 04:09 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non-Halting is that the machine won't reach its final >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> staste even if an unbounded number of steps are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulated. Since HHH doesn't do that, it isn't showing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-halting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by any HHH will never reach its final state >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an unbounded number of steps. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH1 reaches its final state in a finite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of steps. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not very interesting to know whether a simulator >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reports that it is unable to reach the end of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation of a program that halts in direct execution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That IS NOT what HHH is reporting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HHH correctly rejects DDD because DDD correctly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final halt state. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, HHH is not a halt decider because it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not computing the required mapping: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Troll >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:19:42 PM UTC-5, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > In other words you could find any error in my post so you >>>>>>>>>>>> resort to the >>>>>>>>>>>> > lame tactic of ad hominem personal attack. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Troll >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 10:51 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > *Ad Hominem attacks are the first resort of clueless wonders* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I corrected your error dozens of times and you >>>>>>>>> ignore these corrections and mindlessly repeat >>>>>>>>> your error like a bot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which is what you've been doing for the last three years. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Projection, as always. I'll add the above to the list. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TM's cannot possibly ever report on the behavior >>>>>>> of the direct execution of another TM. >>>>>> >>>>>> False: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I did not say that no TM can ever report on >>>>> behavior that matches the behavior of a directly >>>>> executing TM. >>>> >>>> Good, because that's all that's required for a solution to the >>>> halting problem: >>>> >>> >>> There are sometimes when the behavior of TM Description >>> D correctly simulated by UTM1 does not match the behavior >>> correctly simulated by UTM2. >> >> Irrelevant, because to satisfy the requirements, the behavior of the >> described machine when executed directly must be reported. > > I HAVE PROVED THAT THE REQUIREMENT IS WRONG NITWIT. Category error. I want to know if any arbitrary algorithm X with input Y will halt when executed directly. If I had an H that could tell me that in *all* possible cases, I could solve the Goldbach conjecture, among many other unsolved problems. Does an H exist that can tell me that or not?