Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vs78vb$3o6s2$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bart <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 22:48:11 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vs78vb$3o6s2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me> <vrs7oi$1e2j7$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrtq62$2unrb$1@dont-email.me> <vru2t0$35frt$2@dont-email.me>
 <vrufju$3i02s$1@dont-email.me> <vrugmo$3ij4s$2@dont-email.me>
 <vrugut$3j3ah$1@dont-email.me> <vruma5$3mvbj$2@dont-email.me>
 <vs0gsh$1en04$1@dont-email.me> <20250326110011.634@kylheku.com>
 <vs25oi$2pqb$1@paganini.bofh.team> <QadFP.1351322$zz8b.870017@fx09.iad>
 <86r02iicl3.fsf@linuxsc.com> <JUzFP.529511$f81.413611@fx48.iad>
 <vs6jeh$31p79$3@dont-email.me> <dQDFP.256596$D_V4.171478@fx39.iad>
 <vs7788$3ml6o$1@dont-email.me> <87pli0wztv.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 23:48:12 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2249ba52a7656296d3895e7c323ba37";
	logging-data="3939202"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19r3nWTNFc8824/V5OaKchL"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7Di7FO+WKdJErPUAjnPctgtf/PM=
In-Reply-To: <87pli0wztv.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2279

On 28/03/2025 22:33, Keith Thompson wrote:
> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>> On 28/03/2025 20:41, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> [...]
>>> The gnu compiler is not multithreaded.  The single thread was
>>> compute bound for 13 minutes and 46 seconds.
>>
>> So what was that -j96 about?
> 
> "-j96" is an option to GNU make, not to the compiler.  It might invoke
> gcc multiple times in parallel, but each invocation of gcc will still be
> single-threaded.
> 

So, is there just once instance of gcc at work during those 13 minutes, 
or multiple?

In other words, would it take longer than 13:40 mins without it, or does 
it help? If -j96 makes no difference, then why specify it?