Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Black nurse gets called N-word by trans sex offender. Guess
 who gets punished?
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 23:12:54 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vs7ofm$3qukg$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vs70k2$3f9kq$2@dont-email.me> <vs7kvc$2g79$3@dont-email.me>
 <vs7n6t$4m3m$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 04:12:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cde2c257b5d46fcc24685e0145e39068";
	logging-data="4029072"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WPL3+rMx/PYzweTRZS5RXxVcYW1gdrAQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i5j+l3QR6FpUdw3XmK1/4XVunok=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250328-4, 3/28/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vs7n6t$4m3m$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 3257

On 2025-03-28 10:51 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/28/2025 10:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A black nurse was treating a sex offender who happened who was not
>>> remotely feminine-looking. She didn't know how he identified and it
>>> wasn't in the medical chart. She stepped out in the hallway to phone a
>>> doctor to ask his advice about treatment and innocently referred to him
>>> as Mr. X. The sex offender overheard this and went nuts screaming the
>>> N-word at her: he was upset that his wasn't referred to as a woman.
>>> Obviously, punishment had to follow and it did: the NURSE was
>>> reprimanded for mis-gendering the patient and is now at risk of losing
>>> her job and her profession since she may be banned from nursing now.
>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7ugvDzwIYc [11 minutes]
>>
>> I'm declaring the entire legal system to be sanity-challenged.
> 
> The outraged contention here seems to be that, because her guy was a 
> bonafide asshole, she should be excused from following 
> protocol ...especially if it's dumb protocol.  I'm not sure that's 
> defensible.
> 
> https://www.yahoo.com/news/nhs-nurse-punished-calling- 
> transgender-162443087.html
> 

I truly don't understand why you felt the need to post the exact same 
thing THREE times but notwithstanding that, did you read the part of the 
article you yourself posted that said the nurse was getting advice about 
a catheter? Catheters for men and catheters for women are different. If 
she had referred to the patient as Miss X to the doctor, and he'd said 
to apply a catheter designed for a female, she might have injured the 
patient simply because this retarded protocol wouldn't let her refer to 
the patient as "him". Does your insistence on sticking to protocol just 
because it is protocol really extend to doing the patient harm because 
deferring to the delusions of the patient is more important than the 
risk of injuring the person?

-- 
Rhino