Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: The Ninth Doctor & Rose Return!
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 22:25:16 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vs8las$1739u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0p3rptos5gd000@post.eweka.nl>
 <vptyBmAgDn5nFw49@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk> <vs68bv$2rf7c$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p3u95nyj2fm001@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:25:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7a1208710c42c4578454c445970820d";
	logging-data="1281342"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Bz0Io0F/ss3SsUjWGIUvE"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F5apmIDLR3zG3XeCsLckMk7d1BU=
In-Reply-To: <xn0p3u95nyj2fm001@post.eweka.nl>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250329-0, 3/29/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 2217

On 29/03/2025 1:06 am, Blueshirt wrote:
> Daniel70 wrote:
>> On 28/03/2025 8:50 pm, John Hall wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm a little surprised that Christopher Eccleston agreed to
>>> do it, as I  had the impression that he hated his time doing
>>> the TV series and never  wanted anything more to do with
>>> Doctor Who.
>>
>> Given what others have been watching on/in "Doctor Who" in the
>> last few years .... I'm guessing Christopher Eccleston didn't
>> have a problem with "Doctor Who" so much as with the
>> Director/Producer/whatever of "Doctor Who" back in 2005!!
> 
> Basically, yes. Christopher Eccleston fell out with members of
> the Doctor Who production team [Phil Collinson & Julie Gardner]
> during the first recording block for Series One. His issue
> wasn't with "Doctor Who" per se.
> 
Hmm!! You didn't mention the name I was thinking of!! ;-)
-- 
Daniel70