Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: Truly Random Numbers On A Quantum Computer??
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 22:09:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <vs9r3a$2ciql$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vs73jc$3jepm$1@dont-email.me> <vs7a9c$3pg3k$1@dont-email.me>
	<86h63cys29.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 23:09:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e8f68b4c9fa1fd1b53a3af7fa6e93c3e";
	logging-data="2509653"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LRNCZgy5OPActeUInLpi7"
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IrDO4eEnoAwBR6O1LbuB+8WMeP0=

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 11:50:06 +0000, Richmond wrote:

> Random is without a predictable pattern or plan.

Let’s say I collect and store a sequence that meets your definition. Then 
I play it back when you ask me for a random number sequence. Does it still 
meet your definition? If not, what has changed?