Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 22:20:37 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vs9rnl$2ciql$8@dont-email.me>
References: <vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me>
	<1830f15ad744a064$76635$735129$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<slrnvuehc7.r9s.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vs7pvd$8b9k$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 23:20:38 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e8f68b4c9fa1fd1b53a3af7fa6e93c3e";
	logging-data="2509653"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8k23zAYffYE4/WaXxsZ/U"
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZjQjIzYdUOdwtNdauslBxehVJ3g=
Bytes: 1647

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 00:38:21 -0400, Paul wrote:

> There is more than one NTFS driver now. There is one in kernel and one
> in FUSE. They're different. From different sources.

I think the kernel one is still lacking in features compared to ntfs-3g, 
which is the FUSE-based driver.

Some people automatically assume that a kernel-based driver is going to 
offer better performance than one that runs in user space. But I can’t see 
big enterprise shops, moving heavily into Linux, continuing to run 
mission-critical workloads on NTFS volumes, let’s face it.