Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 23:24:28 +0000
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vs9vfc$2hg1m$1@dont-email.me>
References: <UX6BP.512735$Kb9a.408485@fx16.ams4>
 <vr3ir8$39jtg$1@dont-email.me> <3KgBP.513160$Kb9a.94584@fx16.ams4>
 <vr6948$1jnlo$1@dont-email.me> <KWEBP.424367$NN2a.82900@fx15.ams4>
 <vr8pi1$3r8lv$1@dont-email.me> <NrYBP.191725$C8m7.108955@fx11.ams4>
 <vrbu8h$2km30$1@dont-email.me> <S7fCP.743699$nb1.627959@fx01.ams4>
 <vre64b$lcu3$1@dont-email.me> <2AACP.939386$gHk7.592478@fx17.ams4>
 <vreqb6$174ma$1@dont-email.me> <vs6334$2mosu$1@dont-email.me>
 <S8yFP.697907$B61.152494@fx02.ams4> <vs6rt6$3bo7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <8KCFP.235115$i41.177634@fx06.ams4> <vs83if$la7f$1@dont-email.me>
 <0BUFP.41399$0a1.40507@fx09.ams4> <vs9c2r$1t658$1@dont-email.me>
 <9sXFP.136944$cgs7.32030@fx14.ams4> <vs9tio$2fk02$1@dont-email.me>
 <18%FP.1503961$gHk7.1102038@fx17.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:24:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8376cb1110cc3e46fed89a04e4bfa95b";
	logging-data="2670646"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tVXw1opBbUKsg3MuWiWyVoFfqUugaiKIA5PrGw604xA=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bV5mMn1kF6sLEyBo7hL0Y9aAE2k=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <18%FP.1503961$gHk7.1102038@fx17.ams4>
Bytes: 2720

On 29/03/2025 23:13, Mr Flibble wrote:
> Just because you cannot imagine how to implement something it doesn't
> follow that other's cannot, dear.

Just because you claim that you have implemented something it 
doesn't follow that your claim is accurate. It may be, of course, 
but it may not.

Just because you assume you're right and adopt a disparaging tone 
towards people who are wary of your claim doesn't make you right.

Your arrogance, coupled with your inability to follow and engage 
constructively with Mikko's points, doesn't speak highly of your 
ability to think logically, so even if I had no other ground for 
being sceptical of your claim, that one alone would be 
sufficient. You might be right, of course, but I'm not holding my 
breath waiting for any convincing supporting evidence.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within