Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vsbt2d$1uci3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: 43 18
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:55:41 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vsbt2d$1uci3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <3c5bd85818.1743323527@gqvve.zu> <2fb735d0fd.1743325433@mqpbr.uq> <8c0cb3620f.1743326600@zbeta.zg> <vsb9op$digq$3@dont-email.me> <dec2b0b989.1743344531@pyuaw.ju> <vsbokk$1p5rn$1@dont-email.me> <cfa30ceeac.1743352750@firor.rv>
Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 18:55:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9cb6b6ad66934156840598f936e441db";
	logging-data="2044483"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bWv9XtegeDawFP33zKW5o"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:63LeoLSAc2FsNMDf+Z1mqzWmigQ=
Bytes: 2142

Mini Mailer <bounce.me@mini.mailer.msg> wrote:
> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 30/03/2025 15:22, Mini Mailer wrote:
>> > Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> > > On 30/03/2025 10:23, Mini Mailer wrote:
>> > > > 7TIF7LwSWzkdecLlTj8wu84q3TTxA7D5/xcwH3HJZjkkLbMsTjUvwrM72TEF9LEHDT/P7I/WFdH=
>> > > 
>> > > They are different programs with different purposes, so there's not much
>> > > point in comparing them. For example, SCOS2 was designed to encrypt
>> > > *only* printable ASCII, a restriction that in the quest for
>> > > internationalisation your program completely overlooks... and that's
>> > > fine, because they are different programs with different purposes. Your
>> > > program also adds a layer of difficulty to ciphertext-only attacks,
>> > > whereas SCOS2 was designed to be easy to attack. And that too is fine;
>> > > they are different programs with different purposes.
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > Well, their purposes should be the same
>> 
>> Why?
>> 
> I said: ..., posting encoded messages to Usenet.

That's not an answer to the question.