Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vsbt2d$1uci3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich <rich@example.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: 43 18 Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:55:41 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <vsbt2d$1uci3$1@dont-email.me> References: <3c5bd85818.1743323527@gqvve.zu> <2fb735d0fd.1743325433@mqpbr.uq> <8c0cb3620f.1743326600@zbeta.zg> <vsb9op$digq$3@dont-email.me> <dec2b0b989.1743344531@pyuaw.ju> <vsbokk$1p5rn$1@dont-email.me> <cfa30ceeac.1743352750@firor.rv> Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 18:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9cb6b6ad66934156840598f936e441db"; logging-data="2044483"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bWv9XtegeDawFP33zKW5o" User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:63LeoLSAc2FsNMDf+Z1mqzWmigQ= Bytes: 2142 Mini Mailer <bounce.me@mini.mailer.msg> wrote: > Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 30/03/2025 15:22, Mini Mailer wrote: >> > Richard Heathfield wrote: >> > > On 30/03/2025 10:23, Mini Mailer wrote: >> > > > 7TIF7LwSWzkdecLlTj8wu84q3TTxA7D5/xcwH3HJZjkkLbMsTjUvwrM72TEF9LEHDT/P7I/WFdH= >> > > >> > > They are different programs with different purposes, so there's not much >> > > point in comparing them. For example, SCOS2 was designed to encrypt >> > > *only* printable ASCII, a restriction that in the quest for >> > > internationalisation your program completely overlooks... and that's >> > > fine, because they are different programs with different purposes. Your >> > > program also adds a layer of difficulty to ciphertext-only attacks, >> > > whereas SCOS2 was designed to be easy to attack. And that too is fine; >> > > they are different programs with different purposes. >> > > >> > >> > Well, their purposes should be the same >> >> Why? >> > I said: ..., posting encoded messages to Usenet. That's not an answer to the question.