| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vsel6l$scf9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: [Slight OT] 2001: The Alternative Trip. Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:59:49 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <vsel6l$scf9$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 19:59:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0dc724762d781f7239a3f0a0f5ea5b64"; logging-data="930281"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195DyLXlZS6aFjR30e2Ras+JpT2crfiIaE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZAqcKr3lyMFQ2d4yHFHqBnoUJEs= Content-Language: en-US Kubrick and Clarke worked on '2001: A Space Odyssey' in parallel, Kubrick modifying things as he felt necessary for his cinematic vision. For example, the ending is at Jupiter, instead of Saturn, since recreating Saturn's rings was beyond the SFX of 1968. The book and the film diverge, particularly toward the end, though they remain compatible with each other in message, if not detail. I know some of the readers in this group are very much down on AI. But here, 56 years after the original, CB Newham has used AI to create the ending as written by Clarke. Its very much worth a watch. I say that as a serious 2001 'stan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJqllbb6k80 pt