Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:08:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vsha2o$jmg$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vsh5m5$3is6e$1@dont-email.me> <vsh8j1$per$2@reader1.panix.com> <vsh95o$3is6e$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:08:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="20176"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1597
Lines: 22

In article <vsh95o$3is6e$2@dont-email.me>,
Arne Vajhøj  <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>On 4/1/2025 1:42 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <vsh5m5$3is6e$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Arne Vajhøj  <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>>> He looks at size 6.2 -> 7.2 -> 8.2 -> 9.2 and .mar vs .c 6.2 -> 9.2.
>>>
>>> https://vmssoftware.com/resources/blog/2025-03-31-how-big-is-vms/
>> 
>> Wow.  That's a lot smaller than I had expected.
>
>It must be some of the bigger ones.
>
>409/15 * 1.9 MLOC would be over 50 MLOC, which is way too
>high, so "representative of identifiable components of
>the system" must have skewed selection towards
>bigger ones.

I assume these were chosen because they represent the bulk of
what one would consider to be the "core" of VMS.

	- Dan C.