| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vshpkc$69mq$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: LiarBoy Alan Baker Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:33:48 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 63 Message-ID: <vshpkc$69mq$1@dont-email.me> References: <vs1a7n$24aj4$1@dont-email.me> <vs1ls2$27liv$2@dont-email.me> <vshop8$2gao$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5bb220733d2a49059fd7520ac3476706"; logging-data="206554"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/udI2pNw6ywAknLGj19FdYZhgtaRxOS8E=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:R3wKtqF3wEcDkM2Y5mIRBsDS/I8= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <vshop8$2gao$3@dont-email.me> On 2025-04-01 15:19, Tom Elam wrote: > On 3/26/2025 3:51 PM, Alan wrote: >> On 2025-03-26 09:32, Tom Elam wrote: >>> Since he bought another race car in 2018 liarboy Baker has insisted >>> the Honda engine that came with it was not an advantage on the track. >>> Here is what he stated at the time, see the 3rd entry in the >>> conversation: >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/rWCHEEjs1as/m/ >>> ecytpx1dBgAJ >>> >>> "I've known I wanted a Honda-engined >>> Formula F since I started having to keep a Kent in tune. For a club >>> racer, the convenience of an engine with electronic ignition (no >>> ignition timing to adjust), electronic fuel injection (no carburetor >>> jetting to change with changing conditions) and an alternator to keep >>> the battery charged (no need to charge the battery like the total loss >>> Kent-engined cars) is worth a lot. Not to mention that an engine running >>> with a restrictor and therefore operating at less than the stresses it >>> was designed for." >>> >>> So he states that the Honda, with its restrictor plate and modern >>> fuel injected and engine control unit that tunes the engine all by >>> itself is not an advantage? >>> >>> How many drivers have the resources or skills to tune a Ford Kent >>> engine's timing and carb jets for every race to bring out its full >>> power potential? Also, over the long term Alan admits that the Kent >>> is stressed by having to produce more power than it was designed for. >>> How does that affect power over a season of racing? Can't be good. >>> >>> Anyway, despite the new car with what Alan admits is a better engine >>> that he says he wanted has over the last few years almost entirely >>> dropped out of Formula F racing at his home track. Last year he >>> showed up only for the 4th race, had a bit of an accident, and never >>> returned. >>> >>> Now we come to the 2015 season that starts next month. Will liarboy >>> show up or not? You too can find out at https://www.sccbc.net/racers/ >>> results/ >>> >>> I'll certainly be tuning in come April 26! Join me and watch the mayhem. >> >> Lying ass: >> >> I never once said there weren't advantages to choosing a Honda over a >> Kent. In fact, I explained all of that to you when you didn't >> understand it. >> >> What YOU claimed was that the Honda was FASTER ON THE TRACK, and that >> part is what is bullshit. >> >> Do you need me to go through all the quotes... >> >> ...again? > > It's faster on the track because the Kents are not always in top tune > while the Honda takes almost no maintenance. That is implied by what you > said. You bought it hoping to win more races. Admit that please. Your claim was that it was faster like-for-like, Liarboy. As I said: do you want me to show you the quotes?