| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vsj0nm$1bsmo$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Muon paradox Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 11:45:51 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Message-ID: <vsj0nm$1bsmo$3@dont-email.me> References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <5fd51fea02c903ebf93a2ef52d94ca20@www.novabbs.com> <vshbig$3ojsg$1@dont-email.me> <bd85b5fefec8ef329d396c87d6acf4f7@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 11:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bf960fb6ecdacf1de8cdd8e78b27c063"; logging-data="1438424"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18baNa2zJrz1B/wXpozEIyT" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:/p1l65JecKaTg4QRV1hSIFO04eU= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <bd85b5fefec8ef329d396c87d6acf4f7@www.novabbs.com> Bytes: 2722 Den 01.04.2025 23:24, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen: > On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 18:38:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > >> Den 01.04.2025 19:42, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen: >>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:40:23 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>> >>>> Do muons move at a different velocity in the laboratory than in the >>>> atmosphere? >>>> >>>> "No, muons generally do not move at a different velocity in a >>>> laboratory >>>> setting compared to their velocity in the atmosphere; they both travel >>>> at speeds very close to the speed of light, typically around 99.8% of >>>> the speed of light" - Google search AI. >>>> >>>> Then why would they "time dilate" in the atmosphere? >> >>> This argument proves that muons do not time dilate in the atmosphere >>> because the alleged cause is absent. >>> >> >> Your logical analyses are mind blowing! >> >> Congratulation! :-D > It's mind-blowing that you're dodging the question! According to > relativity, what allegedly causes the time dilation of the muons? If the > speed is the same, what is the cause? Your "question" is so nonsensical that the all that can be understood is that you have no clue. Here is the very short explanation of what the "time dilation" is. The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs. This is time dilation. It is a measured FACT. Do you claim otherwise? -- Paul https://paulba.no/