Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vslc7c$28n3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AJL <noemail@none.com> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: A good thing or a bad thing (Was: Tutorial: Working example of removing & re-installing Android system apps from a PC) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 07:09:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <vslc7c$28n3$1@dont-email.me> References: <vriv1f$on5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vs76u3$3mi2a$1@dont-email.me> <vs79ur$3p7oc$1@dont-email.me> <vs84bb$2fbe$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <7u5lblxjel.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vs9bce$lhf$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vs9n14$29b0t$1@dont-email.me> <vsaoed$14o2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vscm5u$2nsik$2@dont-email.me> <vsdfgi$1erf6$1@matrix.hispagatos.org> <m4v45jFhthU3@mid.individual.net> <vsee4p$lv1j$1@dont-email.me> <m502h3F5hdmU1@mid.individual.net> <vsf5lc$1f7ni$1@dont-email.me> <vsisfl$1cfuj$1@dont-email.me> <vsjkvd$25mtr$1@dont-email.me> <vsjmic$27cmc$1@dont-email.me> <vsjr1p$2bu7g$1@dont-email.me> <vsju47$2f0je$1@dont-email.me> <vskhk2$334o6$1@dont-email.me> <vskl40$36nl8$1@dont-email.me> <vsl7ve$3u4ki$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 09:09:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c112eb583fe070f614841454b4ea56e6"; logging-data="74467"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zfJyfMoittCz6L1GgQrNh" User-Agent: PhoNews/3.13.3 (Android/11) Cancel-Lock: sha1:D7E3oQsbyRezueaqpBzRRSJCHTg= In-Reply-To: <vsl7ve$3u4ki$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 5257 On 4/2/25 10:57 PM, Peter wrote: >AJL <noemail@none.com> wrote: > >>>So my statements remain backed up that Google & Apple don't provide what >>>over three quarters of Samsung phones provide, and Samsung is clearly the >>>best seller on the market bar none (Apple iPhones don't even come close). >> >> I guess it's how one reads your original statement. When one compares Apple >> and Google phones I think most folks think Android phones with Google >> installed. But you are correct if you mean only Google Pixel phones. I >> guess what threw me off is that would leave out the majority of the >> non-Apple market, many with no slots. Shouldn't they have required some of >> your wrath too? > >I'm glad you clarified and I apologize for not fully understanding you. >I think we're both communicating well now, given how conversations go. >When you said 'Google', I didn't realize you had maybe meant 'Android'. I'm reading you and posting back in an Android group... >When I think of a "Google phone", I think of the Pixel model only. >But you were apparently thinking of Google's Android OS - which is fine. When an Android phone won't operate unless it's signed into Google it's not hard to think of it as a Google phone. I think many folks think that way and perhaps that's why I've never heard a Pixel owner refer to his phone a Google phone. Have you? >The beauty of Android is if you *want* the sdcard slot, you can get it. >Most Android's sold are Samsung & 75% of the Samsung models have the slot. > >Maybe that's why most Android's sold are Samsungs in the first place. :) > >>>I wonder if people buy Samsungs because they don't have the strategy of >>>fleecing them by removing hardware so that the consumer has to buy it back? >> >> I bought my Samsung phone over 5 years ago and I can't remember what my >> reasons were for buying it over other brands. But I can tell you it is >> still a virgin. I've never had any need to stick anything in it's slot... >If you don't need the memory, the slot doesn't help or hurt you. >But if you need the memory, NOT having the slot hurts you a lot. Yup. And the market has lots of phone choices for you slot needing folks. >Fundamentally, everything else being equal, a phone without the slot is >clearly a substandard phone to one that has the slot. That's pure logic. Not so much. It depends on the need of the customer. I have an iPhone user in my house that's been using for decades and no slot complaints. Fact is I'm not sure she would even know what we're talking about. >I'm use to people making the argument that a worse phone is better. >But they don't know anything about basic logic since that makes no sense. >A phone with the slot, everything else being equal, can not only do >EVERYTHING that the phone without the slot can do, but it can do more. Yup. It can also collect dust and crud. Same with the USB port I never use (wireless charging). Hopefully my next phone will be hole free. >And what it can do no phone on the planet without a slot can hope to do. >That's worth a lot when you need it; and it's worth nothing if you don't. As I said, 5+ years with no need of the holes on my phone. I suppose some will bitch when the power plug leaves too. Being modern I use my phone wirelessly, both charging and data. But as always the market will decide...