Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vslfvi$52m4$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.tomockey.net!news.samoylyk.net!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Muon paradox Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:18:21 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 49 Message-ID: <vslfvi$52m4$1@dont-email.me> References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <5fd51fea02c903ebf93a2ef52d94ca20@www.novabbs.com> <vshbig$3ojsg$1@dont-email.me> <bd85b5fefec8ef329d396c87d6acf4f7@www.novabbs.com> <vsj0nm$1bsmo$3@dont-email.me> <c92c755aaef3f66da2aeeef99ec1b159@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:13:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="244a8e26ffdfda2cb006914ab83bd5af"; logging-data="166596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cAgfMzOsbuCgBsXUdJrRB" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:/U2vm1aO17BLT/NdFbxmo60F0Gg= In-Reply-To: <c92c755aaef3f66da2aeeef99ec1b159@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2743 Den 02.04.2025 19:46, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 9:45:51 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >> >> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs >> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs. >> >> This is time dilation. >> >> It is a measured FACT. >> >> Do you claim otherwise? > Paul, all you can do is recite the math like a zombie. A very interesting statement. When you see math, you assume it must be written by a zombie since you don't understand it. The zombie is the one who doesn't understand the math. > The whole point > of this thread was to see if any relativist could explain the cause of > time dilation when the speed is the same. No one has even tried because > they can't. This statement shows that you don't know what "time dilation" is, so I am telling you: The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs. These are measured facts! This is time dilation. ----------------------- If you claim otherwise, then you better give another explanation of why the mean lifetime of a muon can be measured to have two different values when it is measured in two different frames of reference. If you flee the question yet again, I will ask you yet again. -- Paul https://paulba.no/