| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vsmf7k$15kf6$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Future of online fora Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:07:00 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 81 Message-ID: <vsmf7k$15kf6$4@dont-email.me> References: <vsm50r$qq1s$1@dont-email.me> <7j7tujt1qqsjncjl13c5saoujqjk5d6sra@4ax.com> <vsm7vl$qq1s$2@dont-email.me> <vsm9g2$vpcs$2@dont-email.me> <vsma8i$vpcs$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 19:07:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7269e417a75adea799614f20bc367038"; logging-data="1233382"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196F44/7w81dwx0jvFk3PWe" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:JswcOBKUH7HJtfDTXrgG8QzMxTc= In-Reply-To: <vsma8i$vpcs$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4238 On 4/3/2025 10:42 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote: > On 4/3/2025 11:29 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> On 4/3/2025 11:03 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>> On 4/3/2025 9:54 AM, John B. wrote: >>>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:12:46 -0500, AMuzi >>>> <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The forum LFGSS (London Fixed Gear and Single Speed) is >>>>> among the early casualties of The Planners in the UK nanny >>>>> state. Under the well invoked principle, "Everyone ought >>>>> to, because I say so", newly enacted internet regulation >>>>> makes online providers fully responsible for online >>>>> content >>>>> including purported crimes of "revenge [whether >>>>> personal or >>>>> by class], extreme pornography, sex trafficking, >>>>> harassment, >>>>> coercive or controlling behavior and stalking." >>>>> >>>>> Since interpretation of those can be highly subjective* >>>>> and >>>>> in light of the huge volume of content, every word of >>>>> which >>>>> is a possible offense, providers such as Microcosm, who >>>>> wrote the popular group forum software, have deleted all >>>>> activity and more have followed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *c.f. plentiful examples of the last three right here on >>>>> RBT. Or not. That's the nature of subjective evaluation. >>>> >>>> A week or so ago I read a notice that both Tom Sawyer >>>> and Alice in >>>> Wonderland had been blacklisted by some group or another. >>>> >>>> Alice for the term "evil witch" or something similar. >>>> >>>> As for Tom I can only assume that any reference of the >>>> Civil war will >>>> soon be unmentionable in polite society. >>> >>> Yes, there's that. And a greater loss, which is the >>> nearly complete obliteration of Huckleberry Finn, a far >>> superior volume to the forced and anemic Tom Sawyer. >>> It's among the most powerful anti racism works ever >>> published, but it's been banned in schools for decades. >> >> Hmm. I just reread it a month or so ago. I thought the >> portrayal of Jim was too cartoonish. I also thought the >> ending was weak. >> >> Yes, just a subjective evaluation. > > Further consideration (and apologies for responding to my > own post): > > Maybe I just engaged in a bit of "presentism" - that is, > judging past actions by standards of the present, which is > often unjust. > > I don't doubt that Mark Twain's writing and his portrayal of > Jim was groundbreaking in his day. The fact that a black > slave (Jim) was shown as emotional, industrious, courageous > and reasonably intelligent was probably shocking and eye > opening to Twain's audience at the time. That's true even if > the portrayal had a long way to go by present standards. > > I reread _Huckleberry Finn_ as sort of prep work for the > current novel _James_ which is, reportedly, the same story > told from the slave's perspective. It's coming up soon on my > list of books to read. > Back to the issue, would you consider it appropriate for grammar school age children or not? -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971