Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vspohn$ll8l$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 00:04:23 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 38 Message-ID: <vspohn$ll8l$1@dont-email.me> References: <vsn1fu$1p67k$1@dont-email.me> <vso3j4$2vbn4$1@dont-email.me> <vso3ov$2vems$1@dont-email.me> <vso4oc$30ine$1@dont-email.me> <vspb09$75m8$6@dont-email.me> <vspdbr$9vr7$1@dont-email.me> <vspka6$h4r2$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 01:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9ba5473c49a0346d8825952a0365662d"; logging-data="709909"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ncb5UA2nZnhhmTegsGldYS4yMF7rJ32qfsepnh6mXyQ==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:A5EsOTz/Ch58qw5gnn0pZKTAOus= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <vspka6$h4r2$5@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2394 On 04/04/2025 22:52, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 20:53:31 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> On 04/04/2025 20:13, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> That proof doesn’t quite work, because at any point in the >>> construction, the number can be shown to match some later item in the >>> list. >> >> Then show it. > > Simple: you have N digits of the supposed-incomputable number so far, and > there are only B**N (where B is the base of the number system, e.g. 10) > possible combinations for those digits, compared to an infinite number of > remaining items in the rest of the list that you haven’t looked at. > Therefore Stop right there... > every possible one of those B**N possibilities will occur > somewhere in that remaining list. You have repeated this claim several times, but so far you have offered no support in its evidence. Not all lists are random. > Therefore the partial number constructed > so far will always match some later item in the list. QED. Assumes facts not in evidence. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within