Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vsprgq$mdap$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:55:06 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <vsprgq$mdap$1@dont-email.me> References: <ehhutjlft3b11qb7cd6rq8ed410hg41lom@4ax.com> <vrpk5t$2v2e0$1@dont-email.me> <mrl0ujtuqdb4mg2tgd9n5aojemffs6is0r@4ax.com> <vrsjoi$1l5lu$3@dont-email.me> <cjp3ujt8q0273ljkeu7tbe647333lctnqq@4ax.com> <vrsueg$1u3ji$3@dont-email.me> <mj04ujldfmcth908kn938cicg8a5g895f8@4ax.com> <vrt00g$1u3up$9@dont-email.me> <0a34uj9pf5r7f4kneahsc4v6qgfq1684mi@4ax.com> <vrt57k$1u3ji$12@dont-email.me> <7j64uj172e6b9tat3v1n7gla57mml2ag0j@4ax.com> <vrt75c$1u3up$13@dont-email.me> <k3n0vj9gjq062flnc42d7mi3ahsthu2gfv@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 01:55:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f286090aa2ad026c866cb249c3620a72"; logging-data="734553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Sep0T2gKCxkmTz1LZoV5Ce0nYLgHFafE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:P0cYCYH+FasdJ7h4abW1IT6xSPc= In-Reply-To: <k3n0vj9gjq062flnc42d7mi3ahsthu2gfv@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-CA Bytes: 2356 On 2025-04-04 15:27, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>> https://i.imgur.com/bNZVr8U.png >> >> You've just shown that you DO NOT need 32GB of RAM... >> >> (and that Linux isn't smart enough to count RAM in base-2). > > > https://i.imgur.com/4jItMI0.png > > As you can see, today, I have puked out a little into swap. > Dude: give it up. You've got 33.5 decimal gigabytes of RAM. 19.2GB is in use with the other 14.3GB used for cache. And 3.7MB... ....one HUNDREDTH of one percent of it... ....is swapped out... ....and you think that's a solid argument? Linux has 14.3GB used for caching and for some reason chooses to swap a tiny, TINY fraction of data rather than use a little less for cache... ....and you think you're proving something good?