Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vsprgq$mdap$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:55:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vsprgq$mdap$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ehhutjlft3b11qb7cd6rq8ed410hg41lom@4ax.com>
 <vrpk5t$2v2e0$1@dont-email.me> <mrl0ujtuqdb4mg2tgd9n5aojemffs6is0r@4ax.com>
 <vrsjoi$1l5lu$3@dont-email.me> <cjp3ujt8q0273ljkeu7tbe647333lctnqq@4ax.com>
 <vrsueg$1u3ji$3@dont-email.me> <mj04ujldfmcth908kn938cicg8a5g895f8@4ax.com>
 <vrt00g$1u3up$9@dont-email.me> <0a34uj9pf5r7f4kneahsc4v6qgfq1684mi@4ax.com>
 <vrt57k$1u3ji$12@dont-email.me> <7j64uj172e6b9tat3v1n7gla57mml2ag0j@4ax.com>
 <vrt75c$1u3up$13@dont-email.me> <k3n0vj9gjq062flnc42d7mi3ahsthu2gfv@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 01:55:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f286090aa2ad026c866cb249c3620a72";
	logging-data="734553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Sep0T2gKCxkmTz1LZoV5Ce0nYLgHFafE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:P0cYCYH+FasdJ7h4abW1IT6xSPc=
In-Reply-To: <k3n0vj9gjq062flnc42d7mi3ahsthu2gfv@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 2356

On 2025-04-04 15:27, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>>> https://i.imgur.com/bNZVr8U.png
>>
>> You've just shown that you DO NOT need 32GB of RAM...
>>
>> (and that Linux isn't smart enough to count RAM in base-2).
> 
> 
> https://i.imgur.com/4jItMI0.png
> 
> As you can see, today, I have puked out a little into swap.
> 

Dude: give it up.

You've got 33.5 decimal gigabytes of RAM.

19.2GB is in use with the other 14.3GB used for cache.

And 3.7MB...

....one HUNDREDTH of one percent of it...

....is swapped out...

....and you think that's a solid argument?

Linux has 14.3GB used for caching and for some reason chooses to swap a 
tiny, TINY fraction of data rather than use a little less for cache...

....and you think you're proving something good?