Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Tariffs and bikes
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 21:43:55 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vsq1sr$u1ot$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vsn7f2$1v127$1@dont-email.me>
 <cmtvujp4du2ueafd153951ipsg86rkf38e@4ax.com> <vsp0k4$3qc5f$2@dont-email.me>
 <vsp174$3nmvp$1@dont-email.me> <CnYHP.1856619$t84d.221123@fx11.iad>
 <9so0vj9dtabf7b7a1uh1rm6iub84pm0659@4ax.com> <vspvqk$t4ed$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 03:43:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="62e17b4d6eabdf8fc911c7e06ff0481b";
	logging-data="984861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0DktnIW2r0W35BCkNrSA445G2sWDobsg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oOL8OOt/v2nko9D6GX3orZIWO/w=
In-Reply-To: <vspvqk$t4ed$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2723

On 4/4/2025 9:08 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>  
> Tax revenue as percent of GDP shows no direct relationship to statutory 
> marginal rates or political policy:
> 
> https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.TAX.TOTL.GD.ZS?locations=US
> 
>Looks to me like it tended to rise during Democrat presidential terms 
and fall during Republican presidential terms.

> Oh, and about that "94%" rate (which virtually no one ever paid), it ran 
> only in FDR's last full year alive and into 1945, dropped after the war 
> to 91% and continued until Lyndon Johnson, with Democrats running both 
> chambers, dropped it to 77%:
I'm sure "virtually no one ever paid" the high marginal tax rates, 
largely because people earning that much money invest in tax experts and 
lawyers to minimize their tax burdens by any legal, and some very 
questionable tactics.

But I think it's significant that with top tax percentage rates in the 
90s, then in the 70s, the country was generally quite prosperous. Middle 
class prosperity soared. So what was the downside?

True, we had fewer millionaires and no multibillionaires, but as I 
recall, we got along pretty well without them.

Overall, I think the government should be doing less to help 
megamillionaires and more to help, say, a couple elderly widows I've met 
who are both trying to scrape by only on Social Security. Don't worry, 
Musk and Bezos and Zuckerberg won't go hungry. Honest!

-- 
- Frank Krygowski