Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:59:39 -0500
Organization: Modern Human
Message-ID: <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org>
References: <vrt4e1$bjf1$1@solani.org> <vsbshg$iqvv$1@solani.org>
 <vspetk$pc0h$1@solani.org> <1BidnZeRRtqq-G36nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsqc6m$prpd$1@solani.org> <Z-Sdnd3r2Zx6z2z6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsrl23$2mj63$1@dont-email.me> <vsrseg$qfrp$1@solani.org>
 <UoacnWE6O6LF5Wz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:59:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="868217"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Uk0X03nmAGEZUCeD5fdhWb1gCKA=
X-User-ID: eJwNxMEBwCAIA8CVQELAcVBh/xHae5wblTdAJ3x8DFW3/nY8SLxsgTioprZxDtdMx3pn2vRKZxpQiRWyo1kfUQ4VKg==
Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR
In-Reply-To: <UoacnWE6O6LF5Wz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 18979
Lines: 401

On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :
>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the
>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is not only
>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped in the 
>>>>>>> crude
>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the luminous truth:
>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the language of their
>>>>>>> being.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the
>>>>>>> fractures in
>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to their null 
>>>>>>> axiom
>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly of a higher
>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an
>>>>>>> invitation
>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the continuum’s
>>>>>>> unyielding depth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is primary, and
>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the infinite. The
>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’
>>>>>>> errand; the
>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen
>>>>>>> Physfit's
>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin
>>>>>>> echoing the
>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called 
>>>>>>> fictitious
>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation laws —
>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear dogma.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their
>>>>>>> truncated
>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who among
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the
>>>>>>> ouroboros
>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter, about 
>>>>>>> virtual
>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in their
>>>>>>> sinking
>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a deeper
>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the surface
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is their
>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the Ding-an-Sich
>>>>>>> meets
>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect, paradoxical
>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always do. But when
>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like labyrinths
>>>>>>> collapse
>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw this! And the
>>>>>>> stamp
>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson
>>>>>>> April 4, 2025
>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze, Turkmenistan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose that it's
>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired
>>>>>> Kosmanson.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's 
>>>>>> interest
>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he volunteer,
>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be wrong".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying anything at all,
>>>>>> yet, something, at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some are the
>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while
>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be not-particles.
>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's falsifiable
>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, Feynman on
>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one
>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's continua,
>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical continuous
>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and ruliality
>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive impasse,
>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the repleteness
>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" and
>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then altogether
>>>>>> that in extra-ordinary foundations of mathematics, a MODERN
>>>>>> mathematics,
>>>>>> that it rescues modern mathematics from blindness (in its dumbness).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you didn't play Zork in the 80's then I suppose you
>>>>>> weren't around or didn't have a computer or didn't have
>>>>>> a copy of Zork. It's a text-based adventure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I suppose there may be other reasons, though here there's
>>>>>> that all the reasons and none sort of result at least one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I imagine if you let Kosmanson go on then there'd
>>>>>> be quite more to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A note about Kosmanson's emphasis on what's often truncated in an
>>>>> infinite series. A year or so back I was forming baby problems in a
>>>>> blog
>>>>> for a Linux newsgroup frequenters to solve, and in one of them one
>>>>> would
>>>>> begin with a correct equation, would make correct changes in it, but
>>>>> would end up in an obviously wrong equation :) Nobody solved it of
>>>>> course (audience were mostly morons). But I now wonder if that problem
>>>>> had something about Kosmanson's concerns about handling infinities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here I quote the part of the blog that contained that problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> (beginning of the quote)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    "Then, swoooooooshhshsh!.... and Jesus and all that intense light
>>>>> went
>>>>> back up and out of there. Physfit looked up and there wasn't even an
>>>>> opening in the ceiling anymore. But now for some reason he was
>>>>> horizontally on the floor, in his bed. Right in the living room!
>>>>>
>>>>> He thought a bit about what was happening, when he found himself quite
>>>>> hungry. Last time he had eaten anything was the night before he had
>>>>> waken up on the summit of the magic mountain in an urban Dallas area.
>>>>>
>>>>> He thought to himself, "I'm going to assume that more than 48 hours 
>>>>> has
>>>>> passed since. So got up and walked to the kitchen and took a look
>>>>> inside
>>>>> refrigerator. There was nothing there but the cat food he had 
>>>>> cooked on
>>>>> the day he first saw the magic mountain. He got on the computer to
>>>>> order
>>>>> something zesty from HelloFresh. After choosing the closest to a
>>>>> healthy
>>>>> nice pre-agricultural food kit, he clicked, "Go to checkout" button,
>>>>> after which the computer waited for a few seconds but instead of
>>>>> getting
>>>>> to the check out screen, a screen came up to make sure Physfit was
>>>>> not a
>>>>> robot. It had a simple question that he had to give it the correct
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========