Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vssjcu$3l5ki$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Proving the: Simulating termination analyzer Principle Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 20:54:54 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <vssjcu$3l5ki$1@dont-email.me> References: <vss56v$375du$2@dont-email.me> <vss6ie$389d8$3@dont-email.me> <vss7av$375du$8@dont-email.me> <vss7em$389d8$5@dont-email.me> <vssa6p$3b2j0$2@dont-email.me> <vssdo7$3evdr$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 02:55:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bcde48334a22ad361275cf2d77511bb9"; logging-data="3839634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19TImNXOiDA0GtTxC3Y3cEBhykb0+Kj4Zo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:XfGRM6rvIY1f2Mp/O99qFZP8nkk= In-Reply-To: <vssdo7$3evdr$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1473 On 06/04/2025 00:18, olcott wrote: .... > Termination analyzers are not required to be infallible. The Halting Problem refers to the impossibility of an infallible termination analyzer. Fallible termination analyzers are trivially possible - the question's not worth thinking about.