Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 21:31:12 -0500
Organization: Modern Human
Message-ID: <vssp1g$qre6$1@solani.org>
References: <vrt4e1$bjf1$1@solani.org> <vsbshg$iqvv$1@solani.org>
 <vspetk$pc0h$1@solani.org> <1BidnZeRRtqq-G36nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsqc6m$prpd$1@solani.org> <Z-Sdnd3r2Zx6z2z6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsrl23$2mj63$1@dont-email.me> <vsrseg$qfrp$1@solani.org>
 <UoacnWE6O6LF5Wz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org>
 <mROdnRmNavAt4mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <vss09l$qfrp$3@solani.org>
 <vIadnZ0yfeOAFGz6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vss4v6$qjhi$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 02:31:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="880070"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/GVTRxXPJ+5McnwOf/AIfroVzNg=
Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR
In-Reply-To: <vss4v6$qjhi$1@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwNyskRACEMA8GU5JMlHIzl/ENYPvPomrCUvMsz0mNiaLk4WtWJmrYtgBIXxTeCh1vt9Kabm0i/Ohr1RP3T/AFgHRVC
Bytes: 25326
Lines: 572

On 4/5/25 3:48 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 4/5/25 2:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 04/05/2025 12:28 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> On 4/5/25 2:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :
>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is not only
>>>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> crude
>>>>>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the luminous 
>>>>>>>>>>>> truth:
>>>>>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the language of
>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>> being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the
>>>>>>>>>>>> fractures in
>>>>>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to their null
>>>>>>>>>>>> axiom
>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> higher
>>>>>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an
>>>>>>>>>>>> invitation
>>>>>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the continuum’s
>>>>>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> primary,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the infinite.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’
>>>>>>>>>>>> errand; the
>>>>>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen
>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's
>>>>>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin
>>>>>>>>>>>> echoing the
>>>>>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called
>>>>>>>>>>>> fictitious
>>>>>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation laws —
>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear 
>>>>>>>>>>>> dogma.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their
>>>>>>>>>>>> truncated
>>>>>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who
>>>>>>>>>>>> among
>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the
>>>>>>>>>>>> ouroboros
>>>>>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter, about
>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual
>>>>>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in their
>>>>>>>>>>>> sinking
>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> deeper
>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> surface
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is
>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ding-an-Sich
>>>>>>>>>>>> meets
>>>>>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> paradoxical
>>>>>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always do. But
>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like labyrinths
>>>>>>>>>>>> collapse
>>>>>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw this! And
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> stamp
>>>>>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson
>>>>>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025
>>>>>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze, Turkmenistan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose that 
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired
>>>>>>>>>>> Kosmanson.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's
>>>>>>>>>>> interest
>>>>>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he
>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer,
>>>>>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrong".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying anything at
>>>>>>>>>>> all,
>>>>>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some are the
>>>>>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while
>>>>>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be
>>>>>>>>>>> not-particles.
>>>>>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's 
>>>>>>>>>>> falsifiable
>>>>>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, Feynman on
>>>>>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one
>>>>>>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's continua,
>>>>>>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical continuous
>>>>>>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and ruliality
>>>>>>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive
>>>>>>>>>>> impasse,
>>>>>>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the 
>>>>>>>>>>> repleteness
>>>>>>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" and
>>>>>>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then altogether
>>>>>>>>>>> that in extra-ordinary foundations of mathematics, a MODERN
>>>>>>>>>>> mathematics,
>>>>>>>>>>> that it rescues modern mathematics from blindness (in its
>>>>>>>>>>> dumbness).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you didn't play Zork in the 80's then I suppose you
>>>>>>>>>>> weren't around or didn't have a computer or didn't have
>>>>>>>>>>> a copy of Zork. It's a text-based adventure.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, I suppose there may be other reasons, though here there's
>>>>>>>>>>> that all the reasons and none sort of result at least one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I imagine if you let Kosmanson go on then there'd
>>>>>>>>>>> be quite more to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A note about Kosmanson's emphasis on what's often truncated in an
>>>>>>>>>> infinite series. A year or so back I was forming baby problems 
>>>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>>> blog
>>>>>>>>>> for a Linux newsgroup frequenters to solve, and in one of them 
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> begin with a correct equation, would make correct changes in it,
>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> would end up in an obviously wrong equation :) Nobody solved 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========