Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 22:30:18 -0500
Organization: Modern Human
Message-ID: <vsssgb$qu52$1@solani.org>
References: <vrt4e1$bjf1$1@solani.org> <vsbshg$iqvv$1@solani.org>
 <vspetk$pc0h$1@solani.org> <1BidnZeRRtqq-G36nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsqc6m$prpd$1@solani.org> <Z-Sdnd3r2Zx6z2z6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsrl23$2mj63$1@dont-email.me> <vsrseg$qfrp$1@solani.org>
 <UoacnWE6O6LF5Wz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org>
 <mROdnRmNavAt4mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <vss09l$qfrp$3@solani.org>
 <vIadnZ0yfeOAFGz6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vss4v6$qjhi$1@solani.org>
 <vssp1g$qre6$1@solani.org> <vsspjc$qre6$2@solani.org>
 <vssq82$qre6$3@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 03:30:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="882850"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LcORHkHXxursCSIqNI3GZFblvnc=
Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR
In-Reply-To: <vssq82$qre6$3@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVivAyDuL3H6F3biExOOFxnM50427xaVUJFHeDkToWk41uPuzB4/q278cxRZYCQpe8P4RCFnA=
Bytes: 29251
Lines: 669

On 4/5/25 9:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 4/5/25 9:40 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 4/5/25 9:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> On 4/5/25 3:48 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/25 2:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>> On 04/05/2025 12:28 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/5/25 2:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> luminous truth:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fractures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their null
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> axiom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invitation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuum’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errand; the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echoing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fictitious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dogma.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truncated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> among
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ouroboros
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sinking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ding-an-Sich
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradoxical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do. But
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> labyrinths
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this! And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Turkmenistan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kosmanson.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not-particles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> falsifiable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feynman on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continua,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruliality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impasse,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repleteness
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in extra-ordinary foundations of mathematics, a MODERN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematics,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it rescues modern mathematics from blindness (in its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumbness).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you didn't play Zork in the 80's then I suppose you
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========