| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vsu1t5$15keg$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Tariffs and bikes Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 09:08:35 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 161 Message-ID: <vsu1t5$15keg$2@dont-email.me> References: <vsn7f2$1v127$1@dont-email.me> <cmtvujp4du2ueafd153951ipsg86rkf38e@4ax.com> <vsp0k4$3qc5f$2@dont-email.me> <vsp174$3nmvp$1@dont-email.me> <vsq314$u1ot$2@dont-email.me> <vsq4jk$1047i$1@dont-email.me> <vsqacl$19q77$2@dont-email.me> <dlp1vjtaddvqt4hjdktgb3p9hbes2okenl@4ax.com> <1ds1vj156uc0oaqml128umva7afgamm1qh@4ax.com> <vsrbij$28n8r$5@dont-email.me> <0if2vjpkqsmuhjm7sgvagtanfkhesnos4e@4ax.com> <vsrhgo$2ebas$2@dont-email.me> <a7k3vjtuvn2hh7hohi5jgmkqlbs6i9mhkt@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 16:08:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b086ace5d054b71df46ffdf5158419c5"; logging-data="1233360"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/aktpMRRAAR7QIq+Ei0yV/" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:NPvF3tVLPuKeKwJudw+BvsRmPwA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <a7k3vjtuvn2hh7hohi5jgmkqlbs6i9mhkt@4ax.com> Bytes: 8960 On 4/5/2025 8:02 PM, John B. wrote: > On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 10:16:40 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: > >> On 4/5/2025 9:37 AM, John B. wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 08:35:17 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/5/2025 4:43 AM, John B. wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 05 Apr 2025 04:19:45 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 00:08:53 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/4/2025 10:30 PM, AMuzi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/4/2025 9:03 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 4/4/2025 12:26 PM, AMuzi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can have whatever opinion you like but not your own facts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heck, I thought it was fashionable to have "alternative facts" if you >>>>>>>>> don't like the look of normal ones! Wasn't that made clear during >>>>>>>>> Trump version 1? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> USA has among the most steeply sloped tax regimes on earth, such that >>>>>>>>>> the top 1% of earners pay roughly half of all income tax. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://usafacts.org/articles/who-pays-the-most-income-tax/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The USA also has some of the highest income and wealth disparity of >>>>>>>>> developed nations. Granted, not as bad as many small 3rd world >>>>>>>>> countries - but I think we should not be striving to emulate those. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/issues/economic- justice/income- >>>>>>>>> and-wealth-inequality/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd say that means our tax structure is still insufficiently progressive. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And what should we be trying to achieve anyway? ISTM our nation was >>>>>>>>> founded on the idea of doing away with a privileged class lording it >>>>>>>>> over those purportedly of less worth. Also the idea of everyone (well, >>>>>>>>> as long as their complexion wasn't too dark) getting an equal shot at >>>>>>>>> prosperity. If nothing else, those ideas, if implemented, work toward >>>>>>>>> keeping the masses content enough that they don't literally rebel. >>>>>>>>> Rebellions are messy, unpredictable, and bad for bike shops. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We now have a new privileged class, one that can rake in millions per >>>>>>>>> year and pay lower rates than struggling middle Americans, in part >>>>>>>>> because of clever deductions. Remember Leona Helmsley? "Taxes are for >>>>>>>>> little people." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And of course, any money made over $170,000 per year is free of Social >>>>>>>>> Security duties. Because hey, one's third mega- mansion is much more >>>>>>>>> important than better food for the family making $50,000 per year. Why >>>>>>>>> should the ultra-rich help to keep Social Security afloat? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The 'disparity' is a myth in that it counts only taxable earnings, >>>>>>>> ignoring that fully half the country pays no income tax. Many of those >>>>>>>> receive 'negative tax' payments and in fact dos very well on relief, >>>>>>>> much better than many working people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "The disparity is a myth"?? The GINI index for the U.S. is higher >>>>>>> (worse) than for Britain, Italy, France, Austria, Canada, Australia, >>>>>>> Ireland, Sweden, Albania, Croatia, etc. etc. etc. Yes, it's not as bad >>>>>>> as South Africa, Mexico, Venezuela, Columbia, but it's hardly a myth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regarding wealthy citizens, we do indeed have some inherited wealth but >>>>>>>> almost all the top earners are self made ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's irrelevant. I was not restricting my comments to inherited >>>>>>> wealth. I'm basically saying that our current laws and tax structures >>>>>>> favor the wealthy and especially the very wealthy. That includes >>>>>>> corporations, for which it's not that unusual to pay next to zero >>>>>>> federal taxes. Tax shelters are available to those with tons of money. >>>>>>> Helmsley's "little people" have no access to that trickery. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your snarky racism comment is ridiculous. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I said a big idea for the new nation of the U.S. was that everyone >>>>>>> should get an equal shot if their skin wasn't too dark. Did you somehow >>>>>>> forget that black slavery existed back then? Slaves did not get an equal >>>>>>> shot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, I know you (especially you!) can come up with anecdotes about >>>>>>> modern black guys who have gotten rich. But surely even you don't think >>>>>>> it's as likely for a young black guy to succeed as it is for a young >>>>>>> white guy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are 224 times more black millionaires in USA than the top 19 >>>>>>>> countries of Africa combined. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Go stick your racism somewhere else. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was not comparing black Americans to black Africans. I was comparing >>>>>>> black Americans to white Americans. And in my original statement, I was >>>>>>> comparing those groups in 1776. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Leftists racism nonsense is not working any more as more and more >>>>>> non-white people walk away from the Democrat Party. Perhaps they >>>>>> should stop using it. >>>>> >>>>> 'Re Frank's post above... in early America George Washington, a 3rd >>>>> generation slave owner, assumed ownership of his first 10 slaves when >>>>> he was 11 years old. At his death there were 317 slaves at Mount >>>>> Vernon. >>>> >>>> True although most were acquired at his marriage. >>>> >>>> Odd though that people do harp on him, and on Thomas >>>> Jefferson as well, while exempting John Adams and Benjamin >>>> Franklin from that line of conversation. >>>> >>>> And the same people have no time or attention for today's >>>> open slave markets across the Gulf region, into Sudan and >>>> now, with the sudden absence of French special forces, >>>> across the Sahel as the jihadis take over. >>>> >>>> Not to mention massive scale vivisection of political >>>> prisoners by the CCP for their international organ selling >>>> programs. Oh no, not at all important when bashing Mr >>>> Washington is so entertaining. >>> >>> >>> It is difficult to understand how telling the truth is "bashing". Or >>> has the truth become a sin in modern America? >>> >>> As Winston Churchill (and others ) said, “Those that fail to learn >>> from history are doomed to repeat it.” >> >> It's true. We all have read multiple contemporary accounts. >> No reasonable person doubts that truth. >> >> When incessant harping on that, with no mention of his other >> actions over a long life (and not all exemplary, for example >> that French and Indian War incident) it may well be called >> bashing. YVVM. >> >> Similarly my criticism of the modern education racket is >> that young people can recount all of our country's sins, >> which were real, but none of the good we have done. > > Not to start another helmet or gun fight but the bad things stick > right out in front of "God and Everyone" - long series of "wars" to > deprive the original owners of their land for example, what are the > "good things"? > Really? How about Mr Hoover's Belgian Relief (during the Wilson administration) which extended across Europe and saved millions of lives. https://www.historynet.com/the-man-of-force-who-saved-belgium/ And a few thousand other examples. -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971