| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vsuif4$vq7b$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Tariffs and bikes Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 14:51:15 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 111 Message-ID: <vsuif4$vq7b$4@dont-email.me> References: <vsn7f2$1v127$1@dont-email.me> <cmtvujp4du2ueafd153951ipsg86rkf38e@4ax.com> <vsp0k4$3qc5f$2@dont-email.me> <vsp174$3nmvp$1@dont-email.me> <ri60vjdqgso54pljoe2jb8dnumuatkoo4o@4ax.com> <vspd9o$983l$1@dont-email.me> <O1_HP.1535903$OrR5.782500@fx18.iad> <vsr8e0$27p9l$2@dont-email.me> <BCxIP.155811$Sfe6.85111@fx35.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:51:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a234526dc6533b54861bf1ed0d8d1618"; logging-data="1042667"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LWQsY1wkWHqOx8RHA7p9jqvrJ3lT23hM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:1+5En/ThV0xkzWMlMjMYuHiIPm4= In-Reply-To: <BCxIP.155811$Sfe6.85111@fx35.iad> Content-Language: en-US On 4/6/2025 12:04 PM, cyclintom wrote: > On Sat Apr 5 08:41:35 2025 zen cycle wrote: >> On 4/4/2025 7:36 PM, cyclintom wrote: >>> On Fri Apr 4 14:52:25 2025 AMuzi wrote: >>>> On 4/4/2025 12:59 PM, Shadow wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 11:26:12 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/4/2025 11:16 AM, sms wrote: >>>>>>> The whole idea of increasing taxes on the masses, while >>>>>>> decreasing them on the wealthy, is so Republican, and so >>>>>>> Reaganesque with the fraud of "Trickle-Down Economics." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These new high taxes on discretionary items will be >>>>>>> disastrous since a new bike, a new phone, or even a new car, >>>>>>> is not generally a required purchase, and consumers will be >>>>>>> unwilling to pay much more. So companies like Trek will >>>>>>> likely absorb some of the tariffs by accepting lower margins. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OTOH, some businesses, like car repair shops will see more >>>>>>> business as consumers spend more to keep their existing >>>>>>> vehicle working. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For items that are not discretionary, like food, we'll just >>>>>>> have to pay more for the same items or switch to lower-cost >>>>>>> items. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You can have whatever opinion you like but not your own >>>>>> facts. USA has among the most steeply sloped tax regimes on >>>>>> earth, such that the top 1% of earners pay roughly half of >>>>>> all income tax. >>>>> >>>>> So what is your income tax rate? Here it's from 0 to 27.5% (0% >>>>> for people who don't make enough to eat and pay only purchase tax (60% >>>>> on food) to people that make more than US$ 500, 00 a month and are >>>>> considered "rich" employees. >>>>> >>>>> Businessmen, market "players", multinationals and banks are >>>>> all tax exempt. We are a right wing country, more or less expected. >>>>> Inheritance tax is around 1%, but most millionaires get a judge to >>>>> exempt them. >>>>> >>>>> Give me an example. If Musk manages to buy the judges in Texas >>>>> and gives himself over 50 billion dollars for a year's "hard" work >>>>> breaking Tesla, how much of that will he pay as income tax? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://usafacts.org/articles/who-pays-the-most-income-tax/ >>>>> >>>>> USA facts is founded and run by a billionaire(Steve Ballmer) >>>>> one of the most notorious tax-evaders in the world. LOL, he probably >>>>> deducts any expenses with his "ORG". >>>>> Hardly a "reference" for unbiased tax "facts". >>>>> IMHO >>>>> []'s >>>>>> >>>>>> Moreover, various Cassandras notwithstanding, no significant >>>>>> changes to the current (2017 Act) schedules are in play. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding Trek, otherwise known as The Great Chinese Bicycle >>>>>> Selling Company, meh. >>>> >>>> I carry no water for Mr Ballmer. I (and others) have linked >>>> many tax reporting sites over the years with the same >>>> numbers as that one. >>>> >>>> I also have no animus toward Brasil. Run your own country >>>> any way you like, not my problem. Our tax rates are in >>>> theory zero to 37.5%. >>>> >>>> https://www.irs.gov/filing/federal-income-tax-rates-and-brackets >>>> >>>> In practice, relief here, with our "negative income tax" >>>> policies, is the equivalent of up to $62,000 per year* or >>>> well over what many working people make before taxes. >>>> Again, this is not a policy statement either way, just >>>> reporting. >>>> >>>> https://www.irs.gov/filing/federal-income-tax-rates-and-brackets >>>> >>>> *for 2022. Higher now of course. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> In California add to the top rate another 12%. plus gas tax, plus salews tax,plus 50% inheretance tax, property taxes. and more because all of the rich have left so the have to bleed the poor. >> >> As of 2022, California has the highest number of billionairs of any >> state in the US, and is #4 per capita. >> >> https://www.madisontrust.com/information-center/visualizations/which-us-states-have-the-most-billionaires/ >> >> Please post data to the contrary if you can. > > Do you mean those Hollywood actors who have ashes instead of himes? Tom Sellect isn't bragging that he has a lot of money and he doesn't care. As of 2022, California has the highest number of billionaires of any state in the US, and is #4 per capita. https://www.madisontrust.com/information-center/visualizations/which-us-states-have-the-most-billionaires/ Please post data to the contrary if you can. > > Tell us all what you're worth? I have, repeatedly, as if it has any relevance to "all of the rich have left"