Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 20:34:54 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vsv6jf$28vt6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vsh5m5$3is6e$1@dont-email.me> <vsmj7h$19qc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsmk9b$18rgf$1@dont-email.me> <vsp6ol$eli$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 02:34:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69fc3d0d26e4a53062a6b4470ae74fc6";
	logging-data="2391974"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mznduziitRq2iRshmLXNwYY4meLW+E/4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fajJNC+Uc6Rdrzku1qB1h1xQUDk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vsp6ol$eli$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2999

On 4/4/2025 2:00 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2025-04-03, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>> On 4/3/2025 2:15 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>>> On 2025-04-01, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>>>> He looks at size 6.2 -> 7.2 -> 8.2 -> 9.2 and .mar vs .c 6.2 -> 9.2.
>>>>
>>>> https://vmssoftware.com/resources/blog/2025-03-31-how-big-is-vms/
>>>
>>> How the hell does DCL have 30,000+ lines of code ? :-)
>>> (Even allowing for the fact most of it is in Macro-32)
>>
>> Just for fun I downloaded bash and counted. 117 KLOC.
>>
> 
> Wow. I had no idea it was now that big. OTOH, bash has got a _lot_ more
> functionality in it than DCL does.

6 times more?

>>> Also, regarding those BLISS/Macro-32 figures across the various modules
>>> in general, I wonder how much smaller the code would have been if it had
>>> been written in C ?
>>
>> C is a relative high LOC/FP language.
>>
>> Most LOC/FP tables have C in the 100-125 range and macro-assembler
>> in the 200-250 range.
>>
>> If we adjust for VAX instructions being more powerful/complex
>> than average ISA, add a random number and subtract wind speed I
>> will estimate the Macro-32 / C ratio to be around 1.5-1.75.
>>
>> If you buy that then the DCL 33 KLOC would be 19-22 KLOC in C
>> to be compared with bash 117 KLOC.
>>
> 
> The problem with that analysis is what DCL does.
> 
> It basically parses, validates, and executes commands it has been given.
> That is something which can be implemented a lot more easily and concisely
> in a HLL with abstracted data structure capabilities (which includes
> even C) than an assembly language with no such capabilities.

It is not obvious to me that:

(LOC/FP for Macro-32) / (LOC/FP for C)

is a lot higher for a shell than for the average application - data
structures are not anything special for shells.

But maybe.

Arne